Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation - an analysis with REMIND

被引:56
|
作者
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Mouratiadou, Ioanna [1 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [1 ]
Baumstark, Lavinia [1 ]
Brecha, Robert J. [2 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [1 ]
Kriegler, Elmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Dayton, Dept Phys, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
CRUDE-OIL; DEMAND; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0901-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We analyze the dynamics of global fossil resource markets under different assumptions for the supply of fossil fuel resources, development pathways for energy demand, and climate policy settings. Resource markets, in particular the oil market, are characterized by a large discrepancy between costs of resource extraction and commodity prices on international markets. We explain this observation in terms of (a) the intertemporal scarcity rent, (b) regional price differentials arising from trade and transport costs, (c) heterogeneity and inertia in the extraction sector. These effects are captured by the REMIND model. We use the model to explore economic effects of changes in coal, oil and gas markets induced by climate-change mitigation policies. A large share of fossil fuel reserves and resources will be used in the absence of climate policy leading to atmospheric GHG concentrations well beyond a level of 550 ppm CO2-eq. This result holds independently of different assumptions about energy demand and fossil fuel availability. Achieving ambitious climate targets will drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption, in particular the consumption of coal. Conventional oil and gas as well as non-conventional oil reserves are still exhausted. We find the net present value of fossil fuel rent until 2100 at 30tril.US$ with a large share of oil and a small share of coal. This is reduced by 9 and 12tril.US$ to achieve climate stabilization at 550 and 450 ppm CO2-eq, respectively. This loss is, however, overcompensated by revenues from carbon pricing that are 21 and 32tril.US$, respectively. The overcompensation also holds under variations of energy demand and fossil fuel supply.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Representing global climate change, adaptation and mitigation
    Barker, T
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [22] Global Climate Change Mitigation: Strategic Incentives
    Perdana, Sigit
    Tyers, Rod
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (03): : 183 - 206
  • [23] Classification of mitigation measures to global climate change
    Yanagisawa, Y
    [J]. STRATEGIC VALUE OF FOSSIL FUELS: CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 717 - 719
  • [24] Soil carbon and the mitigation of global climate change
    Machado, PLOD
    [J]. QUIMICA NOVA, 2005, 28 (02): : 329 - 334
  • [25] Patience and climate change mitigation: Global evidence
    Cai, Meina
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    Murtazashvili, Jennifer Brick
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 186
  • [27] Global climate change impacts on forests and markets
    Sohngen, Brent
    Tian, Xiaohui
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 72 : 18 - 26
  • [28] Global climate change impacts on forests and markets
    Tian, Xiaohui
    Sohngen, Brent
    Kim, John B.
    Ohrel, Sara
    Cole, Jefferson
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [29] The effect of global climate change, population distribution, and climate mitigation on building energy use in the US and China
    Zhou, Yuyu
    Eom, Jiyong
    Clarke, Leon
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 119 (3-4) : 979 - 992
  • [30] The impact of climate change mitigation policies on European labour markets
    Alexandri, Eva
    Anton, Jose-Ignacio
    Lewney, Richard
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 216