Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation - an analysis with REMIND

被引:56
|
作者
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Mouratiadou, Ioanna [1 ]
Luderer, Gunnar [1 ]
Baumstark, Lavinia [1 ]
Brecha, Robert J. [2 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [1 ]
Kriegler, Elmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Dayton, Dept Phys, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
CRUDE-OIL; DEMAND; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-013-0901-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We analyze the dynamics of global fossil resource markets under different assumptions for the supply of fossil fuel resources, development pathways for energy demand, and climate policy settings. Resource markets, in particular the oil market, are characterized by a large discrepancy between costs of resource extraction and commodity prices on international markets. We explain this observation in terms of (a) the intertemporal scarcity rent, (b) regional price differentials arising from trade and transport costs, (c) heterogeneity and inertia in the extraction sector. These effects are captured by the REMIND model. We use the model to explore economic effects of changes in coal, oil and gas markets induced by climate-change mitigation policies. A large share of fossil fuel reserves and resources will be used in the absence of climate policy leading to atmospheric GHG concentrations well beyond a level of 550 ppm CO2-eq. This result holds independently of different assumptions about energy demand and fossil fuel availability. Achieving ambitious climate targets will drastically reduce fossil fuel consumption, in particular the consumption of coal. Conventional oil and gas as well as non-conventional oil reserves are still exhausted. We find the net present value of fossil fuel rent until 2100 at 30tril.US$ with a large share of oil and a small share of coal. This is reduced by 9 and 12tril.US$ to achieve climate stabilization at 550 and 450 ppm CO2-eq, respectively. This loss is, however, overcompensated by revenues from carbon pricing that are 21 and 32tril.US$, respectively. The overcompensation also holds under variations of energy demand and fossil fuel supply.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 82
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation – an analysis with REMIND
    Nico Bauer
    Ioanna Mouratiadou
    Gunnar Luderer
    Lavinia Baumstark
    Robert J. Brecha
    Ottmar Edenhofer
    Elmar Kriegler
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2016, 136 : 69 - 82
  • [2] Energy security and global climate change mitigation
    Huntington, HG
    Brown, SPA
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (06) : 715 - 718
  • [3] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Akashi, Osamu
    Wada, Kenichi
    Kanudia, Amit
    Li, Jun
    Weyant, John
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) : 397 - 411
  • [4] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Masahiro Sugiyama
    Osamu Akashi
    Kenichi Wada
    Amit Kanudia
    Jun Li
    John Weyant
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2014, 123 : 397 - 411
  • [5] Global Energy Transformation and the Impacts of Systematic Energy Change Policy on Climate Change Mitigation
    Gunes, Hakan
    Simba, Hamis Miraji Ally
    Karadag, Haydar
    Sit, Mustafa
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [6] The effectiveness of energy service demand reduction: A scenario analysis of global climate change mitigation
    Fujimori, S.
    Kainuma, M.
    Masui, T.
    Hasegawa, T.
    Dai, H.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 : 379 - 391
  • [7] Role of endogenous energy efficiency improvement in global climate change mitigation
    Duan, Hongbo
    Zhang, Gupeng
    Fan, Ying
    Wang, Shouyang
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2017, 10 (02) : 459 - 473
  • [8] Role of endogenous energy efficiency improvement in global climate change mitigation
    Hongbo Duan
    Gupeng Zhang
    Ying Fan
    Shouyang Wang
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2017, 10 : 459 - 473
  • [9] Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option
    Diana Silva Siqueira
    Josué de Almeida Meystre
    Maicon Queiroz Hilário
    Danilo Henrique Donato Rocha
    Genésio José Menon
    Rogério José da Silva
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2019, 24 : 749 - 777
  • [10] Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option
    Siqueira, Diana Silva
    Meystre, Josue de Almeida
    Hilario, Maicon Queiroz
    Donato Rocha, Danilo Henrique
    Menon, Genesi Jose
    da Silva, Rogerio Jose
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2019, 24 (05) : 749 - 777