A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision

被引:122
|
作者
Goff, Rebecca R. [1 ]
Uccellini, Kimberly [1 ]
Lindblad, Kelsi [1 ]
Hall, Shelley [2 ]
Davies, Ryan [3 ]
Farr, Maryjane [4 ]
Silvestry, Scott [5 ]
Rogers, Joseph G. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Childrens Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Advent Hlth Transplant Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
clinical research; practice; health services and outcomes research; heart disease; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); patient survival; statistics; UNITED NETWORK; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.16010
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) modified adult heart allocation to better stratify candidates and provide broader access to the most medically urgent candidates. We analyzed OPTN data that included waiting list and transplant characteristics, geographical distribution, and early outcomes 1 year before (pre: October 18, 2017-October 17, 2018) and following (post: October 18, 2018-October 17, 2019) implementation. The number of adult heart transplants increased from 2954 pre- to 3032 postimplementation. Seventy-eight percent of transplants in the post era were for the most medically urgent (statuses 1-3) compared to 68% for status 1A in the pre era. The median distance between the donor hospital and transplant center increased from 83 to 216 nautical miles, with an increase in total ischemic time from 3 to 3.4 hours (allP < .001). Waiting list mortality was not different across eras (14.8 vs 14.9 deaths per 100 patient-years pre vs post respectively). Posttransplant patient survival was not different, 93.6% pre and 92.8% post. There is early evidence that the heart allocation policy has enhanced stratification of candidates by their medical urgency and broader distribution for the most medically urgent candidates with minimal impact on overall waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2781 / 2790
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of the 2016 revision of US pediatric heart allocation policy on waitlist characteristics and outcomes
    Magnetta, Defne A.
    Godown, Justin
    West, Shawn
    Zinn, Matthew
    Rose-Felker, Kirsten
    Miller, Susan
    Feingold, Brian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (12) : 3276 - 3283
  • [22] Donor and Recipient Age Influence Outcomes Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation in the 2018 US Heart Allocation System
    Iyanna, Nidhi
    Hong, Yeahwa
    Hess, Nicholas R.
    Ziegler, Luke A.
    Dorken-Gallastegi, Ander
    Hickey, Gavin W.
    Keebler, Mary E.
    Kaczorowski, David J.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2025, 109 (03) : 549 - 557
  • [23] Heart Transplant Allocation In Desperate Need of Revision
    Mancini, Donna M.
    Schulze, P. Christian
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : 1179 - 1181
  • [24] Outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the 2018 adult heart allocation policy
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Xia, Yu
    Tran, Zachary
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Dobaria, Vishal
    Choi, Chun Woo
    Benharash, Peyman
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (05):
  • [25] Heart Transplant Outcomes for Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD) Before and after the 2018 Revision of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Adult Heart Allocation System
    Pizula, J.
    Yang, K.
    Li, J.
    Shah, S.
    Liu, G.
    Lee, A.
    Banankhah, P.
    Nattiv, J.
    Miklin, D.
    Genyk, P.
    Kingsford, P.
    Pandya, K.
    Joeseph, R.
    Fong, M.
    Luanda, G.
    Kiankhooy, A.
    Hashmi, S.
    Nuno, S.
    Wolfson, A.
    Salimbangon, A.
    Chand, R.
    Vucicevic, D.
    Corey, L.
    Depasquale, E.
    Vaidya, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 776 - 777
  • [26] Geographic Variation Exists in Heart Transplantation for Status One and Two Patients after the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change
    Hassanein, M. T.
    Singh, S.
    Spragan, D.
    Kaku, Y.
    Kurlansky, P.
    Latif, F.
    Sayer, G.
    Uriel, N.
    Takeda, K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (04): : S30 - S31
  • [27] Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Donor Heart Use Before and After the 2018 UNOS Heart Allocation Policy Change
    Browne, Adeline
    Gaines, Holly
    Alharethi, Rami
    Goodwin, Matt
    Selzman, Craig H.
    Fang, James C.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    Stehlik, Josef
    Hanff, Thomas C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2023, 29 (02) : 220 - 224
  • [28] Practice Changes at US Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy
    Parker, William F.
    Chung, Kevin
    Anderson, Allen S.
    Siegler, Mark
    Huang, Elbert S.
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (23) : 2906 - 2916
  • [29] Same Game New Rules: What is the Impact of the 2018 UNOS Heart Allocation Change?
    Whalen, L. B.
    Dahl, J.
    Krebs, E.
    Yarboro, L. T.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S267 - S267
  • [30] Impact of Sex on Access to Donor Organs and Clinical Outcomes in the New 2018 US Adult Heart Allocation System - OPTN/UNOS Analysis
    Okoh, A. K.
    Mehra, M. R.
    Tayal, R.
    Drakos, S. G.
    Machado, S.
    Yin, M. G.
    Lee, L. Y.
    Shah, K.
    Russo, M. J.
    Vaduganathan, M.
    Stehlik, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S27 - S27