A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision

被引:122
|
作者
Goff, Rebecca R. [1 ]
Uccellini, Kimberly [1 ]
Lindblad, Kelsi [1 ]
Hall, Shelley [2 ]
Davies, Ryan [3 ]
Farr, Maryjane [4 ]
Silvestry, Scott [5 ]
Rogers, Joseph G. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Childrens Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Advent Hlth Transplant Inst, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[7] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词
clinical research; practice; health services and outcomes research; heart disease; heart transplantation; cardiology; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); patient survival; statistics; UNITED NETWORK; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1111/ajt.16010
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) modified adult heart allocation to better stratify candidates and provide broader access to the most medically urgent candidates. We analyzed OPTN data that included waiting list and transplant characteristics, geographical distribution, and early outcomes 1 year before (pre: October 18, 2017-October 17, 2018) and following (post: October 18, 2018-October 17, 2019) implementation. The number of adult heart transplants increased from 2954 pre- to 3032 postimplementation. Seventy-eight percent of transplants in the post era were for the most medically urgent (statuses 1-3) compared to 68% for status 1A in the pre era. The median distance between the donor hospital and transplant center increased from 83 to 216 nautical miles, with an increase in total ischemic time from 3 to 3.4 hours (allP < .001). Waiting list mortality was not different across eras (14.8 vs 14.9 deaths per 100 patient-years pre vs post respectively). Posttransplant patient survival was not different, 93.6% pre and 92.8% post. There is early evidence that the heart allocation policy has enhanced stratification of candidates by their medical urgency and broader distribution for the most medically urgent candidates with minimal impact on overall waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2781 / 2790
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change
    Kilic, Arman
    Mathier, Michael A.
    Hickey, Gavin W.
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    Morell, Victor O.
    Mulukutla, Suresh R.
    Keebler, Mary E.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [2] Association of the 2018 US Heart Allocation Policy Change and the Survival Benefit of Heart Transplantation
    Tolmie, S.
    Gibbons, R.
    Narang, N.
    Parker, W.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S269 - S269
  • [3] Heart Retransplantation Under the 2018 Adult Heart Allocation Policy
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Helmers, Mark
    Iyengar, Amit
    Herbst, D. Alan
    Weingarten, Noah
    Atluri, Pavan
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [4] Heart Retransplantation Under the 2018 Adult Heart Allocation Policy
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Iyengar, Amit
    Helmers, Mark R.
    Weingarten, Noah
    Rekhtman, David
    Song, Cindy
    Shin, Max
    Cevasco, Marisa
    Atluri, Pavan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 117 (03): : 603 - 609
  • [5] Impact of the 2018 change in US allocation policy on adults with congenital heart disease
    Ashraf, Syed Faaz
    Hess, Nicholas
    Seese, Laura
    Kavarana, Minoo N.
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Rajab, Taufiek K.
    Kilic, Arman
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (03): : 373 - 381
  • [6] A national assessment of one-year heart outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation change
    Bradbrook, Keighly
    Goff, Rebecca R.
    Lindblad, Kelsi
    Daly, Richard C.
    Hall, Shelley
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (02): : 196 - 205
  • [7] Impact of the 2018 Adult Heart Allocation Policy Change on the Incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation
    Premananthan, C. S.
    Chen, Q.
    Malas, J.
    Emerson, D.
    Megna, D.
    Catarino, P.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    Kittleson, M.
    Patel, J.
    Chikwe, J.
    Bowdish, M.
    Esmailian, F.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 42 (04): : S73 - S73
  • [8] Impact of the 2018 Adult Heart Allocation Change on Pediatric Donor Offers and Waitlist Outcomes
    Sweat, K. R.
    Kaufman, B.
    Barkoff, L.
    Chen, C.
    Profita, E.
    Lee, E.
    Rosenberg, M.
    Chen, S.
    Hollander, S.
    Almond, C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S510 - S510
  • [9] Race, Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Clinical Outcomes after the 2018 US Adult Heart Allocation System Policy Change
    Okoh, A. K.
    Mehra, M. R.
    Tayal, R.
    Drakos, S. G.
    Machado, S.
    Yin, M. G.
    Lee, L. Y.
    Shah, K. S.
    Russo, M. J.
    Vaduganathan, M.
    Stehlik, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S439 - S439
  • [10] The 2018 adult heart allocation policy change benefits low-volume transplant centers
    Kim, Samuel T.
    Tran, Zachary
    Xia, Yu
    Hadaya, Joseph
    Williamson, Catherine G.
    Gandjian, Matthew
    Choi, Chun Woo
    Benharash, Peyman
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 35 (08)