Two redundant ubiquitin-dependent pathways of BRCA1 localization to DNA damage sites

被引:14
|
作者
Sherker, Alana [1 ,2 ]
Chaudhary, Natasha [1 ]
Adam, Salome [1 ]
Heijink, Anne Margriet [1 ]
Noordermeer, Sylvie M. [1 ,4 ]
Fradet-Turcotte, Amelie [3 ]
Durocher, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Mol Genet, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Res Ctr, LHotel Dieu Quebec,Canc Res Ctr, Laval, PQ, Canada
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Human Genet, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
BARD1; BRCA1; DNA damage; RAP80; ubiquitin; DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PARP INHIBITOR; TARGETS BRCA1; HISTONE H2AX; PROTEIN; RING; BINDING; RECRUITMENT; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.15252/embr.202153679
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The tumor suppressor BRCA1 accumulates at sites of DNA damage in a ubiquitin-dependent manner. In this work, we revisit the role of RAP80 in promoting BRCA1 recruitment to damaged chromatin. We find that RAP80 acts redundantly with the BRCA1 RING domain to promote BRCA1 recruitment to DNA damage sites. We show that that RNF8 E3 ligase acts upstream of both the RAP80- and RING-dependent activities, whereas RNF168 acts uniquely upstream of the RING domain. BRCA1 RING mutations that do not impact BARD1 interaction, such as the E2 binding-deficient I26A mutation, render BRCA1 unable to accumulate at DNA damage sites in the absence of RAP80. Cells that combine BRCA1 I26A and mutations that disable the RAP80-BRCA1 interaction are hypersensitive to PARP inhibition and are unable to form RAD51 foci. Our results suggest that in the absence of RAP80, the BRCA1 E3 ligase activity is necessary for recognition of histone H2A Lys13/Lys15 ubiquitylation by BARD1, although we cannot rule out the possibility that the BRCA1 RING facilitates ubiquitylated nucleosome recognition in other ways.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of BRCA1 nuclear localization with 14 DNA damage response proteins and domains: Identification of specific differences between BRCA1 and 53BP1 at DNA damage-induced foci
    Mok, Myth T. S.
    Henderson, Beric R.
    CELLULAR SIGNALLING, 2010, 22 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [32] BRCA1, BRCA2 and their possible function in DNA damage response
    Kote-Jarai, Z
    Eeles, RA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 81 (07) : 1099 - 1102
  • [33] A conserved pathway to activate BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites
    Polanowska, Jolanta
    Martin, Julie S.
    Garcia-Muse, Tatiana
    Petalcorin, Mark I. R.
    Boulton, Simon J.
    EMBO JOURNAL, 2006, 25 (10): : 2178 - 2188
  • [34] Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the biological response to DNA damage
    Venkitaraman, AR
    JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2001, 114 (20) : 3591 - 3598
  • [35] BRCA1, BRCA2 and their possible function in DNA damage response
    Z Kote-Jarai
    R A Eeles
    British Journal of Cancer, 1999, 81 : 1099 - 1102
  • [36] BRCA1, BRCA2, and DNA damage response: Collision or collusion?
    Zhang, HB
    Tombline, G
    Weber, BL
    CELL, 1998, 92 (04) : 433 - 436
  • [37] BRCA1: an emerging role in the cellular response to DNA damage
    Haber, D
    LANCET, 2000, 355 (9221): : 2090 - 2091
  • [38] Formaldehyde induces DNA damage and BRCA1 nuclear export
    Ponce, Esmeralda M.
    Louie, Maggie C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [39] Understanding the functions of BRCA1 in the DNA-damage response
    Yun, Maximina H.
    Hiom, Kevin
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2009, 37 : 597 - 604
  • [40] Impact of RING and BRCT Domain Mutations on BRCA1 Protein Stability, Localization and Recruitment to DNA Damage
    Nelson, Andrew C.
    Holt, Jeffrey T.
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2010, 174 (01) : 1 - 13