Uncertainty quantification of MEMS devices with correlated random parameters

被引:4
|
作者
Zhao, Lin-Feng [1 ]
Zhou, Zai-Fa [1 ]
Song, Yi-Qun [1 ]
Meng, Mu-Zi [1 ]
Huang, Qing-An [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab MEMS, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
VOLTAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00542-019-04714-7
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The concern about process deviations rises because that the performance uncertainty they cause are strengthened with the miniaturization and complication of Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) devices. To predict the statistic behavior of devices, Monte Carlo method is widely used, but it is limited by the low efficiency. The recently emerged generalized polynomial chaos expansion method, though highly efficient, cannot solve uncertainty quantification problems with correlated deviations, which is common in MEMS applications. In this paper, a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and Nataf transformation based polynomial chaos method is proposed. The distribution of correlated process deviations is estimated using GMM, and modified Nataf transformation is applied to convert the correlated random vectors of GMM into mutually independent ones. Then polynomial chaos expansion and stochastic collection can be implemented. The effectiveness of our proposed method is demonstrated by the simulation results of V-beam thermal actuator, and its computation speed is faster compared with the Monte Carlo technique without loss of accuracy. This method can be served as an efficient analysis technique for MEMS devices which are sensitive to correlated process deviations.
引用
收藏
页码:1689 / 1696
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty quantification for functional dependent random variables
    Nanty, Simon
    Helbert, Celine
    Marrel, Amandine
    Perot, Nadia
    Prieur, Clementine
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2017, 32 (02) : 559 - 583
  • [22] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR PDEs WITH ANISOTROPIC RANDOM DIFFUSION
    Harbrecht, H.
    Peters, M. D.
    Schmidlin, M.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 55 (02) : 1002 - 1023
  • [23] Uncertainty Quantification for Markov Random Fields\ast
    Birmpa, Panagiota
    Katsoulakis, Markos A.
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2021, 9 (04): : 1457 - 1498
  • [24] RANDOM PREDICTOR MODELS FOR RIGOROUS UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Crespo, Luis G.
    Kenny, Sean P.
    Giesy, Daniel P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2015, 5 (05) : 469 - 489
  • [25] Uncertainty quantification for functional dependent random variables
    Simon Nanty
    Céline Helbert
    Amandine Marrel
    Nadia Pérot
    Clémentine Prieur
    Computational Statistics, 2017, 32 : 559 - 583
  • [26] Learning Random Feature Dynamics for Uncertainty Quantification
    Agudelo-Espana, Diego
    Nemmour, Yassine
    Schoelkopf, Bernhard
    Zhu, Jia-Jie
    2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 4937 - 4944
  • [27] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION USING PERIODIC RANDOM VARIABLES
    Kaarnioja, V.
    Kuo, F. Y.
    Sloan, I. H.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2020, 58 (02) : 1068 - 1091
  • [28] Uncertainty analysis in PSA with correlated input parameters
    Karanki D.R.
    Jadhav P.A.
    Chandrakar A.
    Srividya A.
    Verma A.K.
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2010, 1 (01) : 66 - 71
  • [29] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters
    Xu, Chonggang
    Gertner, George Zdzislaw
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (10) : 1563 - 1573
  • [30] Quantification of Uncertainty in Creep Failure of RF-MEMS Switches
    Kolis, Peter
    Bajaj, Anil K.
    Koslowski, Marisol
    JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 26 (01) : 283 - 294