MODELLING THE INSTALLATION OF STIFFENED CAISSONS IN OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY

被引:0
|
作者
Westgate, Z. J. [1 ]
Tapper, L. [1 ]
Lehane, B. M. [1 ]
Gaudin, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Offshore Fdn Syst, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Design of suction caissons for installation in overconsolidated clay presents several geotechnical engineering challenges. These include (i) predicting the installation resistance and required 'suction' pressure, (ii) ensuring adequate skirt length to account for vertical plug heave, and (iii) accommodating the structural engineering stiffening requirements and their effects on the penetration resistance and plug heave. A suite of centrifuge tests in overconsolidated kaolin clay was carried out to investigate the effects of stiffener geometry on penetration resistance during direct jacking and suction installation. Three caisson geometries were compared: caissons with (i) no stiffeners, (ii) horizontal stiffeners only and (iii) both vertical and horizontal stiffeners. Results show negligible differences in penetration resistance between jacked and suction installation for each caisson type. The magnitude of soil heave within the caisson is seen to be highly dependent on the level of applied suction as well as on the volume of the stiffeners. Observations during and following testing indicated that minimal flow-round of the overconsolidated clay occurred for skirts with horizontal stiffeners. These included (i) linear penetration resistance profiles following penetration of the lowest horizontal stiffener, (ii) a wedge of clay observed only below the lowest horizontal stiffener following extraction, and (iii) unsupported plug heave heights following penetration. A comparison of measured data with back-calculated resistance factors suggests that current design methods adequately predict the measured penetration resistance assuming zero flow-round conditions, implying additional end bearing of the upper horizontal stiffener during penetration was negligible.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 126
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Jack-up installation on an uneven seabed: Recommendations from model testing in overconsolidated clay
    University of Maine, Orono, ME, United States
    不详
    Proc Int Conf Offshore Mech Arct Eng - OMAE, 1600, (329-338):
  • [22] JACK-UP INSTALLATION ON AN UNEVEN SEABED: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM MODEL TESTING IN OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY
    Landon, Melissa M.
    Gaudin, Christophe
    Cassidy, Mark J.
    OMAE 2009, VOL 7: OFFSHORE GEOTECHNICS, 2009, : 329 - 338
  • [23] Installation of suction caissons in layered soil
    Watson, P. G.
    Gaudin, C.
    Senders, M.
    Randolph, M. F.
    PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS - 6TH ICPMG '06, VOL 1, 2006, : 685 - +
  • [24] Modeling the dilatancy of overconsolidated clay
    Gao, Zhiwei
    Zhao, Jidong
    Gao, Z. (gzwce@ust.hk), 1600, Springer Verlag : 541 - 545
  • [25] Installation of suction caissons in calcareous silt
    Mohiuddin, M. A.
    Hossain, M. S.
    Kim, Y. H.
    Ullah, S. N.
    Hu, Y.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2025, 325
  • [26] APPLICATION OF A CAM CLAY MODEL TO OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY
    AMERASINGHE, SF
    KRAFT, LM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1983, 7 (02) : 173 - 186
  • [27] Dilating behaviour of overconsolidated clay
    Hattab, M
    Hicher, PY
    SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS, 2004, 44 (04) : 27 - 40
  • [28] Dilatancy Relation for Overconsolidated Clay
    Gao, Zhiwei
    Zhao, Jidong
    Yin, Zhen-Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2017, 17 (05)
  • [29] Numerical investigations of the installation process of giant deep-buried circular open caissons in undrained clay
    Lai, Fengwen
    Liu, Songyu
    Deng, Yongfeng
    Sun, Yanxiao
    Wu, Kai
    Liu, Hanxiang
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 118 (118)
  • [30] Investigation on the Behavior of Stiffened Caisson Installation in Uniform Clay from Large Deformation Modeling
    Wang, Qi
    Zhou, Xiaowen
    Zhou, Mi
    Tian, Yinghui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2020, 20 (09)