True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Yougui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
area under a ROC curve; inverse probability weighting; two-phase design; verification bias; verification probability; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8700
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In medical research, a two-phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW). Since the probability a subject is selected into phase 2 of the study for disease verification is known, both true and estimated verification probabilities can be used to form an IPW estimator for AUC. In this article, we derive explicit variance formula for both IPW AUC estimators and show that the IPW AUC estimator using the true values of verification probabilities even when they are known are less efficient than its counterpart using the estimated values. Our simulation results show that the efficiency loss can be substantial especially when the variance of test result in disease population is small relative to its counterpart in nondiseased population.
引用
收藏
页码:3937 / 3946
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Over Enriched Multipath Fading Conditions
    Sofotasios, Paschalis C.
    Fikadu, Mulugeta K.
    Khuong Ho-Van
    Valkama, Mikko
    Karagiannidis, George K.
    2014 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM 2014), 2014, : 3490 - 3495
  • [32] Neural network design for optimization of the partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    Sahiner, B
    Chan, HP
    Petrick, N
    Gopal, SS
    Goodsitt, MM
    1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-4, 1997, : 2468 - 2471
  • [33] Combining binary and continuous biomarkers by maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    Ahmadian, Robab
    Ercan, Ilker
    Sigirli, Deniz
    Yildiz, Abdulmecit
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 51 (08) : 4396 - 4409
  • [34] Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 5 Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Area under the Curve
    Safari, Saeed
    Baratloo, Alireza
    Elfil, Mohamed
    Negida, Ahmed
    EMERGENCY, 2016, 4 (02): : 111 - 113
  • [35] Multi-instance learning by maximizing the area under receiver operating characteristic curve
    Sakarya, I. Edhem
    Kundakcioglu, O. Erhun
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 85 (02) : 351 - 375
  • [36] The Extension of the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve to Multi-class Problems
    Yang, Bo
    2009 ISECS INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT, VOL II, 2009, : 463 - 466
  • [37] On the optimism correction of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in logistic prediction models
    Iparragirre, Amaia
    Barrio, Irantzu
    Xose Rodriguez-Alvarez, Maria
    SORT-STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH TRANSACTIONS, 2019, 43 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [38] Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in matched case control studies
    Xu, Hui
    Qian, Jing
    Paynter, Nina P.
    Zhang, Xuehong
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    Rexrode, Kathryn M.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Balasubramanian, Raji
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (03) : 437 - 451
  • [39] Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value
    Corbacioglu, Seref Kerem
    Aksel, Goekhan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (04): : 195 - 198
  • [40] Confidence Intervals for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in the Presence of Ignorable Missing Data
    Choi, Hunyong
    Matthews, Gregory J.
    Hare, Ofer
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2019, 87 (01) : 152 - 177