True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Yougui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
area under a ROC curve; inverse probability weighting; two-phase design; verification bias; verification probability; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8700
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In medical research, a two-phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW). Since the probability a subject is selected into phase 2 of the study for disease verification is known, both true and estimated verification probabilities can be used to form an IPW estimator for AUC. In this article, we derive explicit variance formula for both IPW AUC estimators and show that the IPW AUC estimator using the true values of verification probabilities even when they are known are less efficient than its counterpart using the estimated values. Our simulation results show that the efficiency loss can be substantial especially when the variance of test result in disease population is small relative to its counterpart in nondiseased population.
引用
收藏
页码:3937 / 3946
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data
    Hai, Yan
    Qin, Gengsheng
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (30) : 4789 - 4820
  • [2] Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias
    He, Hua
    Lyness, Jeffrey M.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (03) : 361 - 376
  • [3] The walking man approach to interpreting the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    Kohn, Michael A.
    Newman, Thomas B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 162 : 182 - 186
  • [4] Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    de Hond, Anne A H
    Steyerberg, Ewout W
    van Calster, Ben
    The Lancet Digital Health, 2022, 4 (12):
  • [5] Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    de Hond, Anne A. H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    van Calster, Ben
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4 (12): : E853 - E855
  • [6] Estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Parametric and nonparametric ways
    Xu, Weichao
    Dai, Jisheng
    Hung, Y. S.
    Wang, Qinruo
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 93 (11) : 3111 - 3123
  • [7] Estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve using partially ordered sets
    Zamanzade, Ehsan
    Wang, Xinlei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2021, 17 (01): : 139 - 152
  • [8] Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Odds Ratio Should Be Used with Caution
    Hong, Wandong
    Wu, Jiansheng
    Chen, Xiangrong
    HEPATITIS MONTHLY, 2011, 11 (09) : 757 - 757
  • [9] Optimal two-phase sampling for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
    Wu, Yougui
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (04) : 1059 - 1071
  • [10] ROC - ESTIMATION OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVE
    HAYS, RD
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1990, 14 (02) : 208 - 208