The Role of Arthroscopy in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty: Is Revision Always Necessary?

被引:11
|
作者
Guild, Theodore [1 ]
Kuhn, Gabrielle [1 ]
Rivers, Marie [2 ]
Cheski, Rebecca [2 ]
Trenhaile, Scott [2 ]
Izquierdo, Rolando [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Rockford, IL 61107 USA
[2] OrthoIllinois, Orthoped Sports Med Surg Serv, Rockford, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.045
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether arthroscopy is an effective means to diagnose and treat postoperative pain in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA patients. Methods: A 2-year retrospective chart review of patients with a painful shoulder arthroplasty was performed. Patients included in the study had a painful shoulder after previous shoulder arthroplasty without gross signs of infection, severely elevated laboratory markers, implant loosening, or glenoid arthrosis after hemiarthroplasty. Visual analog scale scores, physical examination findings, laboratory studies, culture results, pathology reports, operative records, and postoperative treatment data were collected. Results: The study cohort included 6 male and 7 female patients. Between 2016 and 2018, 7 TSA and 6 reverse TSA patients underwent arthroscopic debridement of adhesions and synovitis with tissue biopsy for cultures and fresh-frozen sections. We arthroscopically treated adhesive capsulitis, subacromial impingement, and acromioclavicular joint arthritis in 3 patients. Three patients required extensive debridement for profound synovitis. All 6 patients had negative findings of cultures and frozen sections, and none required revision arthroplasty. Their average follow-up period was 18.6 months (range, 9-32 months), with improvement in the mean visual analog scale score from 8.2 of 10 (range, 6-10) to 2.5 of 10 (range, 2-8). Two patients had arthroscopic cultures showing Cutibacterium acnes infection. Both required revision with an antibiotic spacer. Findings of cultures and fresh-frozen sections at revision were consistent with arthroscopic findings. Arthroscopic evaluation in 5 additional patients identified mechanical implant failure or a rotator cuff tear. Conclusions: Arthroscopy is a viable option to evaluate and treat painful shoulder arthroplasty. We were able to successfully treat 46% of patients (6 of 13) with arthroscopic procedures, preventing the need for revision arthroplasty. Arthroscopic frozen section and culture results had a 100% correlation with open frozen section and culture results in patients who had cultures obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1514
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Increased revision rates in shoulder arthroplasty following shoulder arthroscopy
    Sharma, Sribava
    Berger, Peter Z.
    Fassihi, Safa C.
    Gu, Alex
    Stadecker, Monica
    Tarawneh, Omar H.
    Campbell, Joshua C.
    Best, Matthew J.
    Mcfarland, Ed G.
    Srikumaran, Uma
    [J]. SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023,
  • [2] The role of arthroscopy for the problem shoulder arthroplasty
    Tytherleigh-Strong, GM
    Levy, O
    Sforza, G
    Copeland, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (03) : 230 - 234
  • [3] Diagnostic Arthroscopy for Detection of Periprosthetic Infection in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Akguen, Doruk
    Maziak, Nina
    Plachel, Fabian
    Minkus, Marvin
    Scheibel, Markus
    Perka, Carsten
    Moroder, Philipp
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (09): : 2571 - 2577
  • [4] The Role of Arthroscopy in Evaluation of Painful Hip Arthroplasty
    McCarthy, Joseph C.
    Jibodh, Stefan R.
    Lee, Jo-Ann
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (01) : 174 - 180
  • [5] Is bone grafting always necessary in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with uncontained glenoid bone defects?
    Verstuyft, Lotte
    Vergison, Laurence
    Van Tongel, Alexander
    De Wilde, Lieven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (08) : 1891 - 1898
  • [6] Routine cultures for seemingly aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty: are they necessary?
    Brolin, Tyler J.
    Hackett, Daniel J.
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    Hsu, Jason E.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (11) : 2060 - 2066
  • [7] The Role of Arthroscopy in Revision of Failed Open Anterior Stabilization of the Shoulder
    Boileau, Pascal
    Richou, Julian
    Lisai, Andrea
    Chuinard, Christopher
    Bicknell, Ryan T.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (10): : 1075 - 1084
  • [8] Arthroscopy for failed shoulder arthroplasty
    Hersch, JC
    Dines, DM
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY, 2000, 16 (06): : 606 - 612
  • [9] Arthroscopy of the symptomatic shoulder arthroplasty
    Doherty, Ciaran
    Furness, Nicholas D.
    Batten, Timothy
    White, William J.
    Kitson, Jeffrey
    Smith, Christopher D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (10) : 1971 - 1976
  • [10] Revision of failed hemiarthroplasty for painful glenoid arthrosis to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Sheth, Mihir M.
    Sholder, Daniel
    Abboud, Joseph
    Lazarus, Mark D.
    Ramsey, Matthew L.
    Williams, Gerald R.
    Namdari, Surena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (10) : 1884 - 1890