A hybrid Delphi-AHP multi-criteria analysis of Moving Block and Virtual Coupling railway signalling

被引:34
|
作者
Aoun, Joelle [1 ]
Quaglietta, Egidio [1 ]
Goverde, Rob M. P. [1 ]
Scheidt, Martin [2 ]
Blumenfeld, Marcelo [3 ]
Jack, Anson [3 ]
Redfern, Bill [4 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
[2] TU Braunschweig, Inst Railway Syst Engn & Traff Safety, Pockelstr 3, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Engn & Phys Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] PK Signalling Ltd, Houldsworth St, Stockport SK5 6DA, Lancs, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Railway operations; Moving block signalling; Virtual coupling; Multi-criteria analysis; Delphi; AHP; DECISION-ANALYSIS; COMPETITIVENESS; TRANSPORT; PROJECTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2021.103250
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The railway industry needs to investigate overall impacts of next generation signalling systems such as Moving Block (MB) and Virtual Coupling (VC) to identify development strategies to face the forecasted railway demand growth. To this aim an innovative multi-criteria analysis (MCA) framework is introduced to analyse and compare VC and MB in terms of relevant criteria including quantitative (e.g. costs, capacity, stability, energy) and qualitative ones (e.g. safety, regulatory approval). We use a hybrid Delphi-Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP) technique to objectively select, combine and weight the different criteria to more reliable MCA outcomes. The analysis has been performed for different rail market segments including high-speed, mainline, regional, urban and freight corridors. The results show that there is a highly different technological maturity level between MB and VC given the larger number of vital issues not yet solved for VC. The MCA also indicates that VC could outperform MB for all market segments if it reaches a comparable maturity and safety level. The provided analysis can effectively support the railway industry in strategic investment planning of VC.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in multi-criteria analysis of the selection of intelligent building systems
    Wong, Johnny K. W.
    Li, Heng
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 43 (01) : 108 - 125
  • [32] The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making
    Chen, Yun
    Yu, Jia
    Khan, Shahbaz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 48 : 129 - 140
  • [33] The multi-criteria analysis (AHP) method use for the environmental problems management: case of the household waste in Morocco
    Driss Elhamdouni
    Abdelkrim Arioua
    Ismail Karaoui
    Kamal Ait Ouhamchich
    Elhousna Faouzi
    Baaddi Aba
    [J]. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 2022, 7 : 13 - 20
  • [34] Coupling multi-criteria analysis and GLM for modelling houses vulnerability to forest fires at WUI
    Maille, Eric
    Pugnet, Lilian
    Hedan, Jessica
    [J]. ADVANCES IN FOREST FIRE RESEARCH 2018, 2018, : 736 - 741
  • [35] Multi-criteria analysis of social isolation barriers amid COVID-19 using fuzzy AHP
    Upadhyay, Hemant Kumar
    Juneja, Sapna
    Maggu, Sunil
    Dhingra, Grima
    Juneja, Abhinav
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2022, 19 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [36] The multi-criteria analysis (AHP) method use for the environmental problems management: case of the household waste in Morocco
    Elhamdouni, Driss
    Arioua, Abdelkrim
    Karaoui, Ismail
    Ouhamchich, Kamal Ait
    Faouzi, Elhousna
    Aba, Baaddi
    [J]. EURO-MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION, 2022, 7 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [37] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for PLM Maturity Analysis based on an Integrated Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR Methodology
    Yu, Xi
    Zhang, Haiqing
    Bouras, Abdelaziz
    Ouzrout, Yacine
    Sekhari, Aicha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 17 (02) : 155 - 179
  • [38] The Expert Perspective in Treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Conditions: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using AHP and BWS
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Kaczynski, Anika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2016, 23 (3-4) : 112 - 125
  • [39] Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to the Indus Reservoir system in Pakistan
    Janjua, Shahmir
    Hassan, Ishtiaq
    [J]. WATER SUPPLY, 2020, 20 (05) : 1933 - 1949
  • [40] OBSTACLES RISK CLASSIFICATION MODEL IN AERODROMES PROTECTION ZONES USING THE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS AHP
    Falavigna, Gabriela Pasetto
    Iescheck, Andrea Lopes
    de Souza, Sergio Florencio
    [J]. BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS, 2021, 27 (04):