Impact of ceiling restriction and lifting barriers on selected physiological and perceptual responses

被引:2
|
作者
Christie, C. J. [1 ]
Wolfe, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhodes Univ, Dept Human Kinet & Ergon, Ergon Unit, ZA-6140 Grahamstown, South Africa
关键词
Manual materials handling; restriction; reach; HANDLING TASKS; POSTURES; REACH; WORK; LOAD; STRENGTH; COSTS;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-2011-1126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare physiological and perceptual responses while lifting with different combinations of ceiling restriction and horizontal reach. Methods: Four lifting conditions with different combinations of ceiling height ('normal' (N) or reduced (R) to 1460 mm) and reach demands (400 mm (N) and 800 mm (F)) were tested. Participants: Thirty two physically active male participants were recruited. Results: Heart rate and oxygen uptake were significantly lower in the URN condition compared to all other conditions. The RF condition was significantly more taxing than all the other conditions. EE was significantly lower between the URN condition and the RN and URF conditions. Central RPE was significantly higher in the RF condition compared to the URN condition. Local RPE was significantly lower comparing the URN and RF conditions. The effect of reach was perceived to have a significant effect on both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal demands whereas ceiling height only had a significant effect on musculoskeletal demands. The greatest discomfort was experienced in the lower back with the most intense discomfort occurring in the RN condition. Conclusions: The RF condition placed the most strain on the participants and the URN, the least strain. The other two conditions were comparable and placed moderate strain on the participants.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 234
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Utilization of kudzu as a lead phytoremediator and the impact of lead on selected physiological responses
    Schwarzauer-Rockett, Kristin
    Al-Hamdani, Safaa H.
    Rayburn, James R.
    Mwebi, Nixon .
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 93 (05) : 951 - 959
  • [12] Physiological, perceptual, and emotional responses of pain anticipation
    Del Grosso, N.
    Messay, B.
    Brick, T.
    Wilson, J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2009, 24 : 153 - 153
  • [13] Comparison of Physiological, Perceptual, and Affective Responses During Overground and Treadmill Walking at a Self-Selected Pace
    Baldari, Carlo
    Guidetti, Laura
    Campos, Wagner
    Buzzachera, Cosme F.
    Elsangedy, Hassan M.
    Colombo, Heriberto
    da Silva, Sergio G.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2008, 40 (05): : S365 - S366
  • [14] Selected physiological and perceptual responses during a simulated limited overs century in non-elite batsmen
    Pote, Lee
    Christie, Candice J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2016, 16 (06) : 654 - 660
  • [15] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO WEIGHT LIFTING IN DIFFERENT PLANES
    KUMAR, S
    ERGONOMICS, 1980, 23 (10) : 987 - 993
  • [16] PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF WOMEN DURING LIFTING EXERCISE
    WILLIAMS, CA
    PETROFSKY, JS
    LIND, AR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 50 (01): : 133 - 144
  • [17] SELECTED PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF CHICKENS TO SOUND
    BROWN, WH
    GLICK, B
    AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 1969, 50 (10): : 598 - &
  • [18] SELECTED PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES OF CHICKENS TO SOUND
    BROWN, WH
    GLICK, B
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1971, 14 (03): : 508 - &
  • [19] The Impact of Wrist Percooling on Physiological and Perceptual Responses during a Running Time Trial Performance in the Heat
    Denby, Kelsey
    Caruso, Ronald
    Schlicht, Emily
    Ives, Stephen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (20) : 1 - 14
  • [20] No effect of meal intake on physiological or perceptual responses to self-selected high intensity interval exercise (HIIE)
    Astorino, Todd A.
    Sherrick, Sarah
    Mariscal, Monique
    Jimenez, Vianney Camarillo
    Stetson, Kelli
    Courtney, Daniel
    BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2019, 36 (03) : 225 - 231