The roles of PTEN, cMET, and p16 in resistance to cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

被引:18
|
作者
da Costa, Alexandre A. B. A. [1 ]
Costa, Felipe D'Almeida [2 ]
Araujo, Daniel Vilarim [1 ]
Guedes Camandaroba, Marcos Pedro [1 ]
Fonseca de Jesus, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Oliveira, Audrey [1 ]
Fonseca Alves, Ana Caroline [1 ]
Stecca, Carlos [1 ]
Machado, Larissa [1 ]
Feraz de Oliveira, Andrea Cruz [2 ]
de Oliveira, Thiago Bueno [1 ]
Nicolau, Ulisses Ribaldo [1 ]
Cordeiro de Lima, Vladmir Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Med Oncol Dept, 211 Prof Antonio Prudente St, BR-01509900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Pathol Dept, 211 Prof Antonio Prudente St, BR-01509900 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Cetuximab resistance; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; PTEN; MET; P16; Predictive factors; Prognostic factors; CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS CETUXIMAB; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; METASTATIC HEAD; C-MET; EXPRESSION; RECURRENT; MARKER; POOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-018-1234-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There is no established biomarker for cetuximab efficacy in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of PTEN, cMET, and p16 expression in recurrent HNSCC. In this retrospective study, 112 patients with recurrent HNSCC received chemotherapy (CT) alone (n=37) or chemotherapy with cetuximab (n=75). PTEN, cMET, and p16 protein expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The median overall survival (mOS) for the patients treated with cetuximab+CT versus CT alone was 11.4 months and 7.0 months, (p=0.949). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.2 months versus 3.0 months (p=0.154). Patients with PTEN loss exhibited a mOS of 5.8 months versus 10.5 months (p=0.002) and a mPFS of 3.2 months versus 4.7 months (p=0.019). A multivariate analysis identified an independent association between PTEN loss and OS (HR 2.27; 95% confidence 95% CI 1.27-4.08; p=0.006) and with PFS (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.09-2.99; p=0.022). A negative prognostic impact of PTEN loss was observed in the patients treated with cetuximab+CT, and not in the CT only group. Expression of cMET and p16 showed no impact on OS or PFS. The present findings confirm that PTEN is a prognostic factor for metastatic HNSCC and they support further studies of PTEN expression to evaluate its predictive value to cetuximab response.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carboplatin Versus Cetuximab Chemoradiation in Cisplatin Ineligible Patients with Locally Advanced p16 Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Barney, C.
    Healy, E.
    Zamora, P.
    Aljabban, J.
    Walston, S. A., Jr.
    Diavolitsis, V. M.
    Blakaj, D. M.
    Wobb, J. L.
    Mitchell, D. L.
    Grecula, J. C.
    Neki, A.
    Rupert, R.
    Savvides, P.
    Bhatt, A. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E322 - E323
  • [22] p16 Immunohistochemical Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Association With Prognostic Parameters
    Hashmi, Atif A.
    Younus, Naila
    Naz, Samreen
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Hussain, Zubaida
    Shaikh, Sara T.
    Ali, Javaria
    Faridi, Naveen
    Najam, Javeria
    Shoaib, Maira
    Hashmi, Shumaila K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [23] IS P16 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY A SURROGATE FOR THE PRESENCE OF AN HPV INFECTION IN HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA?
    Weynand, B.
    Vanhaebost, J.
    Guiot, Y.
    Gregoire, V.
    Machiels, J. P.
    Reychler, H.
    Hamoir, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 : S10 - S10
  • [24] Resistance biomarkers in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with cetuximab
    Kamal, Maud
    Leblanc, Olivia
    Vacher, Sophie
    Lecerf, Charlotte
    Jeannot, Emmanuelle
    Klijanienko, Jerzy
    Berger, Frederique
    Hoffmann, Caroline
    Calugaru, Valentin
    Badois, Nathalie
    Chilles, Anne
    Lesnik, Maria
    Krhili, Samar
    Jouffroy, Thomas
    Bieche, Ivan
    Le Tourneau, Christophe
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [25] p16 and p16 beta are potent growth suppressors of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells in vitro
    Liggett, WH
    Sewell, DA
    Rocco, J
    Ahrendt, SA
    Koch, W
    Sidransky, D
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1996, 56 (18) : 4119 - 4123
  • [26] Cellular response to cetuximab in PTEN-silenced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line
    Mriouah, Jihane
    Boura, Cedric
    Pinel, Sophie
    Chretien, Anne-Sophie
    Fifre, Alexandre
    Merlin, Jean-Louis
    Faivre, Beatrice
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2010, 37 (06) : 1555 - 1563
  • [27] Spotlight on Cetuximab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
    Frampton, James E.
    BIODRUGS, 2011, 25 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [28] Cetuximab in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
    Specenier, Pol
    Vermorken, Jan B.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (04) : 511 - 524
  • [29] The utility of p16 immunostaining in fine needle aspiration in p16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Xu, Bin
    Ghossein, Ronald
    Lane, Jason
    Lin, Oscar
    Katabi, Nora
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 54 : 193 - 200
  • [30] The Prevalence and Prognostic Value of p16 in Non-Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Wang, X.
    Yin, Z.
    Wang, P.
    Wang, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E385 - E385