A refined selection method for project portfolio optimization considering project interactions

被引:25
|
作者
Wei, Hechuan [1 ]
Niu, Caiyun [2 ]
Xia, Boyuan [2 ]
Dou, Yajie [2 ]
Hu, Xuejun [3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Syst Engn, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Project portfolio; Project interaction; Multi-objective; Non-dominated solutions; Refined selection; Value and risk; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; INVESTMENT PROJECTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112952
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper proposes two innovative approaches to address the two challenges of project portfolio selection: (i) Determining how project interactions influence the final values of project portfolios, and (ii) selecting the best solution from non-dominated project portfolios. First, based on the dependence relationship between projects and technologies, we construct a project co-utilization network indicating project interactions using the co-citation network method. We also consider project interaction as a regularization item of the value function to indicate the influence of project interactions on the value of project portfolios. Second, we propose a refined selection strategy. All the projects are ranked in the order of their appearance in the ranked association rules. Project portfolios having no highly ranked projects are deleted successively until only one of them remains. Finally, a case of multi-objective project portfolio selection is studied and an optimal project portfolio recommended. A comparison shows the availability and advantages of the proposed approaches. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Project Portfolio Selection and Scheduling with Resource Allocation, Synergies, and Project Divisibility
    Arratia-Martinez, Nancy M.
    Hernandez-Gonzalez, Nelly M.
    Lopez-Irarragorri, Fernando
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [42] An extended model of dynamic project portfolio selection problem considering synergies between projects
    Shen, Zhong
    Li, Xingmei
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 179
  • [43] Finding compromise solutions in project portfolio selection with multiple experts by inverse optimization
    Roland, Julien
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    De Smet, Yves
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 66 : 12 - 19
  • [44] Pareto ant colony optimization with ILP preprocessing in multiobjective project portfolio selection
    Doerner, KF
    Gutjahr, WJ
    Hartl, RF
    Strauss, C
    Stummer, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 171 (03) : 830 - 841
  • [45] Managing Underperformance Risk in Project Portfolio Selection
    Hall, Nicholas G.
    Long, Daniel Zhuoyu
    Qi, Jin
    Sim, Melvyn
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 63 (03) : 660 - 675
  • [46] Project Portfolio Selection: From Past to Present
    Iamratanakul, Supachart
    Patanakul, Peerasit
    Milosevic, Dragan
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 287 - +
  • [47] Project portfolio selection model, a realistic approach
    Urli, Bruno
    Terrien, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 17 (06) : 809 - 826
  • [48] Multiobjective project portfolio selection with fuzzy constraints
    Perez, F.
    Gomez, T.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 245 (1-2) : 7 - 29
  • [49] Estimation of Downside Risks in Project Portfolio Selection
    Kettunen, Janne
    Salo, Ahti
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2017, 26 (10) : 1839 - 1853
  • [50] Project portfolio selection with scheduling: an evolutionary approach
    Martinez-Vega, Daniel A.
    Cruz-Reyes, Laura
    Rangel, Nelson, V
    Gomez S, Claudia G.
    Sanchez S, Patricia
    Perez, Mercedes, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 10 (01): : 25 - 31