A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Circumcision With Shang Ring vs Conventional Circumcision

被引:45
|
作者
Cao, Dehong
Liu, Liangren
Hu, Yingchun
Wang, Jia
Yuan, Jiuhong
Dong, Qiang
Wei, Qiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Urol, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ADULT MALE CIRCUMCISION; PROSTATE-CANCER; DISPOSABLE DEVICE; YOUNG MEN; RISK; UGANDA; ACCEPTABILITY; ACQUISITION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Herein, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence to compare the safety and efficacy of Shang Ring circumcision (SRC) with conventional circumcision (CC) for male patients. Articles were searched by 2 independent reviewers. Overall, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 3314 patients were included. Compared with the CC group, SRC is associated with shorter operative time, lower intraoperative pain score, higher satisfaction with penile appearances, less intraoperative blood loss, lower adverse event rate, and lower wound bleeding rate. SRC appears to be a safer and more effective choice in comparison with CC for male patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 804
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disposable circumcision suture devices versus Shang ring circumcision for management of redundant prepuce or phimosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, ChuiGuo
    Song, Pan
    Zhou, SiRan
    Dai, Yu
    Xu, ChangBao
    Gao, Yuan
    Zhao, XingHua
    [J]. REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE ANDROLOGIA, 2017, 15 (03): : 108 - 118
  • [2] Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huo, Zhong-Chao
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Xiao-Yan
    Liu, Fei
    Fan, Wen-Ju
    Guan, Ru-Hua
    Li, Pei-Feng
    Mo, De-Yang
    He, Yong-Zhi
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2017, 19 (03) : 362 - 367
  • [3] Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis
    Wang, Daya
    Li, Zhijia
    Chen, Ximeng
    Wang, Haibo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2023, 20 (09) : 3699 - 3707
  • [4] Chinese Shang Ring Male Circumcision: A Review
    Ma, Qi
    Fang, Li
    Yin, Wei-qi
    Ma, Jian-wei
    Wu, Ke-rong
    Yan, Ze-jun
    Cheng, Yue
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 100 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [5] Comparison of ring instruments and classic circumcision methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guler, Yavuz
    Ozmerdiven, Gokhun Cagdas
    Erbin, Akif
    [J]. ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 20 (03) : 144 - 158
  • [6] MALE CIRCUMCISION WITH A DISPOSABLE CIRCUMCISION SUTURE DEVICE VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CIRCUMCISION: A META-ANALYSIS
    Li, M.
    Ruan, Y.
    Wang, T.
    Wang, S.
    Liu, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (01): : S64 - S64
  • [7] Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Natasha L. Larke
    Sara L. Thomas
    Isabel dos Santos Silva
    Helen A. Weiss
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2011, 22 : 1097 - 1110
  • [8] Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Larke, Natasha L.
    Thomas, Sara L.
    Silva, Isabel dos Santos
    Weiss, Helen A.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2011, 22 (08) : 1097 - 1110
  • [9] Male Circumcision and Genital Human Papillomavirus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Albero, Ginesa
    Castellsague, Xavier
    Giuliano, Anna R.
    Xavier Bosch, Francesc
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2012, 39 (02) : 104 - 113
  • [10] Effects of circumcision on male sexual functions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tian, Ye
    Liu, Wei
    Wang, Jian-Zhong
    Wazir, Romel
    Yue, Xuan
    Wang, Kun-Jie
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2013, 15 (05) : 662 - 666