共 34 条
Radio-carpal wrist MR arthrography: comparison of ultrasound with fluoroscopy and palpation-guided injections
被引:3
|作者:
Ali, Abeer Houssein
[1
]
Qenawy, Omran Khodary
[1
]
Saleh, Waleed Riad
[2
]
Ali, Abdelaziz Monsef
[3
]
Abdul Monem, Eman Sayed
[4
]
Omar, Nagham Nabil
[1
]
机构:
[1] Assiut Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Fac Med, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fac Med, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Fac Med, Assiut, Egypt
[4] Aleman Gen Hosp, Egyptian Minist Hlth, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Assiut, Egypt
关键词:
Radio-carpal;
Wrist MRA;
Ultrasound;
Fluoroscopy;
Palpation;
MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY;
CT ARTHROGRAPHY;
INTRAARTICULAR INJECTION;
IODINATED CONTRAST;
RADIOCARPAL JOINT;
GUIDANCE;
LIGAMENTS;
ACCURACY;
EFFICACY;
PAIN;
D O I:
10.1007/s00256-021-03845-1
中图分类号:
R826.8 [整形外科学];
R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学];
R726.2 [小儿整形外科学];
R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective To compare ultrasound- (US), fluoroscopy- (FL), and palpation-guided contrast injection techniques used for dorsal radio-carpal wrist MRA. Materials and methods Patients with chronic wrist pain were randomized as to which injection technique they underwent into three groups of 50 participants. Dorsal radio-carpal contrast injection was performed under US, FL guidance (one radiologist for each), or palpation guidance by an orthopedic surgeon. The three techniques were compared by procedure time, success rate, number of attempts needed, frequency and grade of extravasation, joint distension, and MRA image quality. Additionally, any change from baseline wrist pain was recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at five time points (immediately, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 1 week) after injection. Results One hundred and fifty patients (83 males and 67 females; mean age 29 +/- 6.5 years) were included. Success rates for US- and FL-guided injections were 100%, while palpation-guided approach was significantly less successful (72%) (P = 0.02) with significantly more frequent extravasation (56%)(P < 0.001). US guidance was the least time-consuming (6.5 +/- 1.6 min) compared to FL guidance (12.5 +/- 1.9 min) and palpation guidance (8 +/- 1.2 min) (all P < 0.001). The mean number of joint puncture attempts was significantly lower with imaging-guided techniques (1.1 +/- 0.24 and 1.2 +/- 0.4 for US and FL, P = 0.23) compared to palpation-guided one (1.6 +/- 0.8) (P = 0.007). The largest increases in baseline-pain were 8-h post-injection, and US guidance was the least painful at all-time points (all P < 0.05). Joint distension and image quality were significantly better with imaging-guided techniques (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003). Conclusions US-guided radio-carpal injection is a less time-consuming, more tolerable, and successful radiation-free method when compared to FL guidance. Palpation-guided injections require multiple attempts to enter the joint with high failure rates and frequent extravasation.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 775
页数:11
相关论文