Situation assessment for plan retrieval in real-time strategy games

被引:0
|
作者
Mishra, Kinshuk [1 ]
Ontanon, Santiago [1 ]
Ram, Ashwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Comp, CCL, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Case-Based Planning (CBP) is an effective technique for solving planning problems that has the potential to reduce the computational complexity of the generative planning approaches [8,3]. However, the success of plan execution using CBP depends highly on the selection of a correct plan; especially when the case-base of plans is extensive. In this paper we introduce the concept of a situation and explain a situation assessment algorithm which improves plan retrieval for CBP. We have applied situation assessment to our previous CBP system, Darmok [11], in the domain of real-time strategy games. During Darmok's execution using situation assessment, the high-level representation of the game state i.e. situation is predicted using a decision tree based Situation-Classification model. Situation predicted is further used for the selection of relevant knowledge intensive features, which are derived from the basic representation of the game state, to compute the similarity of cases with the current problem. The feature selection performed here is knowledge based and improves the performance of similarity measurements during plan retrieval. The instantiation of the situation assessment algorithm to Darmok gave us promising results for plan retrieval within the real-time constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 369
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Real-time plan adaptation for case-based planning in real-time strategy games
    Sugandh, Neha
    Ontanon, Santiago
    Ram, Ashwin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CASE-BASED REASONING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5239 : 533 - 547
  • [2] Learning in Real-time Strategy Games
    Padmanabhan, Vineet
    Goud, Pranay
    Pujari, Arun K.
    Sethy, Harshit
    [J]. 2015 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICIT 2015), 2015, : 165 - 170
  • [3] Opponent modeling in real-time strategy games
    Schadd, Frederik
    Bakkes, Sander
    Sprouck, Pieter
    [J]. GAME-ON 2007: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT GAMES AND SIMULATION, 2007, : 61 - 68
  • [4] Programmatic Strategies for Real-Time Strategy Games
    Marino, Julian R. H.
    Moraes, Rubens O.
    Oliveira, Tassiana C.
    Toledo, Claudio
    Lelis, Levi H. S.
    [J]. THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 381 - 389
  • [5] Interfacing Agents to Real-Time Strategy Games
    Jensen, Andreas Schmidt
    Kayso-Rordam, Christian
    Villadsen, Jorgen
    [J]. THIRTEENTH SCANDINAVIAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (SCAI 2015), 2015, 278 : 68 - 77
  • [6] Dynamic Formations in Real-Time Strategy Games
    van der Heijden, Marcel
    Bakkes, Sander
    Spronck, Pieter
    [J]. 2008 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND GAMES, 2008, : 47 - 54
  • [7] An abstract model for real-time strategy games
    Keaveney, David
    O'Riordan, Colm
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF CGAMES'2007: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER GAMES: AI, ANIMATION, MOBILE, EDUCATIONAL AND SERIOUS GAMES, 2007, 2007, : 61 - 65
  • [8] Guest Editorial Real-Time Strategy Games
    Buro, Michael
    Ontanon, Santiago
    Preuss, Mike
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND AI IN GAMES, 2016, 8 (04) : 317 - 318
  • [9] PATH CACHING IN REAL-TIME STRATEGY GAMES
    Saenen, Ignace Pieter
    Khalil, Jonas El Sayeh
    Lambert, Peter
    Van de Walle, Rik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES ON INTERFACES AND HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION 2015, GAME AND ENTERTAINMENT TECHNOLOGIES 2015 AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, VISUALIZATION, COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE PROCESSING 2015, 2015, : 147 - 154
  • [10] Evolving Coordination for Real-Time Strategy Games
    Keaveney, David
    O'Riordan, Colm
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND AI IN GAMES, 2011, 3 (02) : 155 - 167