Private, voluntary or public? Comparative cost-effectiveness in community mental health care

被引:16
|
作者
Knapp, M [1 ]
Hallam, A
Beecham, J
Baines, B
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Personal Social Serv Res Unit, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Inst Psychiat, Ctr Econ Mental Hlth, London, England
[3] Univ Kent, Personal Social Serv Res Unit, Canterbury, Kent, England
来源
POLICY AND POLITICS | 1999年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1332/030557399782019589
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Two prominent features of mental health policy in the UK in recent years have been the rundown of hospital provision and the changing of the balance between public and other provider sectors. This article examines the cost, quality of care and outcome implications. Public,voluntary and private providers of mental health care are compared, based on a long-term study of people moving out of psychiatric hospitals in London. Costs are found to be lowest in the private (for-profit) sector, and highest in the NHS and consortium (NHS and voluntary sector partnership) sectors. However, quality of care indicators suggest that the lowest cost sector is performing least well, and the highest cost sectors offer the best quality. These are associated with some differences in user outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 41
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条