Positive Surgical Margins After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study

被引:114
|
作者
Patel, Vipul R. [1 ]
Coelho, Rafael F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rocco, Bernardo [1 ,4 ]
Orvieto, Marcelo [1 ]
Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan [1 ]
Palmer, Kenneth J. [1 ]
Kameh, Darien [1 ]
Santoro, Luigi [1 ]
Coughlin, Geoff D. [1 ]
Liss, Michael [6 ]
Jeong, Wooju [5 ]
Malcolm, John [8 ]
Stern, Joshua M. [9 ]
Sharma, Saurabh [9 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [10 ]
Shikanov, Sergey [10 ]
Shalhav, Arieh L. [10 ]
Zagaja, Gregory P. [10 ]
Ahlering, Thomas E. [6 ]
Rha, Koon H. [5 ]
Albala, David M. [7 ]
Fabrizio, Michael D. [8 ]
Lee, David I. [9 ]
Chauhan, Sanket [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Florida Hosp Celebrat Hlth, Global Robot Inst, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Inst Canc Estado Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Milan, Sez Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[8] E Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA USA
[9] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[10] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2011年 / 186卷 / 02期
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotics; neoplasm recurrence; local; BODY-MASS INDEX; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RISK-FACTORS; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; LOCATION; CANCER; WEIGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.112
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Positive surgical margins are an independent predictive factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We analyzed the incidence of and associative factors for positive surgical margins in a multi-institutional series of 8,418 robotic assisted radical prostatectomies. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the records of 8,418 patients who underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy at 7 institutions. Of the patients 323 had missing data on margin status. Positive surgical margins were categorized into 4 groups, including apex, bladder neck, posterolateral and multifocal. The records of 6,169 patients were available for multivariate analysis. The variables entered into the logistic regression models were age, body mass index, preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, prostate weight and pathological stage. A second model was built to identify predictive factors for positive surgical margins in the subset of patients with organ confined disease (pT2). Results: The overall positive surgical margin rate was 15.7% (1,272 of 8,095 patients). The positive surgical margin rate for pT2 and pT3 disease was 9.45% and 37.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis pathological stage (pT2 vs pT3 OR 4.588, p <0.001) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 2.918, p <0.001) were the most important independent predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Increasing prostate weight was associated with a lower risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (OR 0.984, p <0.001) and a higher body mass index was associated with a higher risk of positive surgical margins (OR 1.032, p <0.001). For organ confined disease preoperative prostate specific antigen was the most important factor that independently correlated with positive surgical margins (4 or less vs greater than 10 ng/ml OR 3.8, p <0.001). Conclusions: The prostatic apex followed by a posterolateral site was the most common location of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Factors that correlated with cancer aggressiveness, such as pathological stage and preoperative prostate specific antigen, were the most important factors independently associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 516
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The incidence and location of positive margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy
    Patel, VR
    Arends, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 347 - 347
  • [12] THE SURGICAL LEARNING CURVE FOR ROBOTIC PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
    Peters, David
    Lee, David
    Wiklund, Peter
    Fung, Jason
    John, Majnu
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    Mudaliar, Kumaran
    Grover, Sonal
    El Douaihy, Youssef
    Leung, Robert
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E784 - E785
  • [13] CLOSE SURGICAL MARGINS APPROXIMATE POSITIVE MARGINS IN RATES OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE AFTER ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Berg, William T.
    Tal, Oded
    Wambi, Chris
    Badani, Ketan K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A227 - A227
  • [14] Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Galetti, Tommaso Prayer
    Cattaneo, Francesco
    Coati, Irena
    Gardiman, Marina
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2014, 81 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [15] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AGE AND MAJOR COMPLICATIONS AFTER ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SERIES
    Zhu, Alec
    Tin, Amy L.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Kowalczyk, Keith
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Mora, Belen
    Gereta, Sofia
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E857 - E857
  • [16] A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PENTAFECTA OUTCOMES AFTER ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN HIGH VOLUME CENTERS
    Muhsin, Haidar Abdul
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Sivaraman, Ananthankrishnan
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Srivastava, Abhishek
    El Rahman, Davide Abed
    Urzua, Christian
    Coelho, Rafael
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Badani, Ketan
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Patel, Vipul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A313 - A314
  • [17] Predicting the risk of positive surgical margins following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Alchin, David R.
    Murphy, Declan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [18] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT STUDY
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Morgantini, Luca
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E985
  • [19] A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Chan, Robert C.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Clark, Peter E.
    Baumgartner, Roxy
    Cookson, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06): : 2385 - 2389
  • [20] Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins After Laparoscopic Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Secco, Silvia
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
    Gardiman, Marina
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2682 - 2688