Empowerment evaluation: theoretical and methodological considerations

被引:8
|
作者
Smith, MK [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland State Univ, Dept Social Work, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
关键词
empowerment evaluation; consumer involvement; self-determination; self-liberation; utilization;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00015-9
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article presents a theoretical framework of empowerment evaluation, addresses methodological issues and suggests operational considerations for evaluators who wish to implement empowerment evaluation. The discussion of these issues reflects the author's experience in facilitating evaluations of human service programs so as to maximize participation by the users. The roots of empowerment evaluation extend to participation theory with the premise that the more participation in decision-making processes the participants have, the likelier they become to commit to and invest in the decisions. Empowerment evaluation provides evaluators with creative approaches to maximizing an evaluation's usefulness, requiring them to play diverse roles as trainers, facilitators, advocates and co-liberators as prescribed by Fetterman (1994). Major benefits of empowerment evaluation include the increased relevance and utility of the evaluation and its tendency to empower the participants of the evaluation. The benefits of empowerment evaluation outweigh such limitations as the overemphasis of face validity and the longer time required for its implementation. These benefits are particularly important in the field of human services where the empowerment of consumers is critical. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 261
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
    Sand, Andrea
    [J]. ANGLIA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ENGLISCHE PHILOLOGIE, 2017, 135 (03): : 561 - 564
  • [42] Scale of Ways of Coping: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
    Nava-Quiroz, Carlos
    Zaira Vega-Valero, Cynthia
    Soria Trujano, Rocio
    [J]. UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2010, 9 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [43] Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations
    Hwang, KK
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 30 (02) : 155 - +
  • [44] EVALUATION OF ANTICONVULSANT DRUGS - METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    HANSON, RA
    MENKES, JH
    PUGATCH, EMJ
    WHITMAN, EN
    ACHOR, LB
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGIST, 1970, 12 (02): : 219 - &
  • [45] Methodological Considerations in the Evaluation of Radiotherapy Technologies
    Burnet, N. G.
    Billingham, L. J.
    Chan, C. S. K.
    Hall, E.
    Macdougall, J.
    Mackay, R. I.
    Maughan, T. S.
    Nutting, C. M.
    Staffurth, J. N.
    Illidge, T. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (10) : 707 - 709
  • [46] AMBULANCE TELEMETRY EVALUATION - METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    POZEN, MW
    BARRETT, D
    VOIGT, GC
    LINDSAY, L
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1974, 50 (04) : 102 - 102
  • [47] Semiotics and Sport Communication Research: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations
    Lee, Jung Woo
    [J]. COMMUNICATION & SPORT, 2017, 5 (03) : 374 - 395
  • [48] The route to recall a dream: theoretical considerations and methodological implications
    Nemeth, Georgina
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2023, 87 (04): : 964 - 987
  • [49] Social dynamics and political control - Theoretical and methodological considerations
    Neuendorff, H
    [J]. KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2000, 52 (01): : 157 - 158
  • [50] THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF SELF-CONCEPT MEASUREMENT
    WAYMENT, H
    ZETLIN, AG
    [J]. ADOLESCENCE, 1989, 24 (94) : 339 - 348