A randomized phase II trial of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Schneeweiss, A. [1 ]
Marme, F. [1 ]
Ruiz, A. [2 ]
Manikhas, A. G. [3 ]
Bottini, A. [4 ]
Wolf, M. [5 ]
Sinn, H. -P. [6 ]
Mansouri, K. [7 ]
Kennedy, L. [8 ]
Bauknecht, T. [7 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Natl Ctr Tumor Dis, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Inst Valenciano Oncol, Dept Oncol, Valencia, Spain
[3] City Oncol Dispensary, Breast Canc Dept, St Petersburg, Russia
[4] Azienda Osped Ist Ospitalieri, Breast Unit, Cremona, Italy
[5] Vivantes Klinikum Urban, Ctr Breast Dis, Berlin, Germany
[6] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Pathol, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[7] Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
[8] Lilly United Kingdom, Surrey, England
关键词
early breast cancer; neoadjuvant systemic treatment; pathological complete response; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; EVERY; 21; DAYS; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; SYSTEMIC TREATMENT; TUMOR; MASTECTOMY; CARCINOMA; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdq400
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) before surgery is a standard option for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) that allows in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Given the promising activity of pemetrexed plus doxorubicin in metastatic breast cancer, it was reasonable to evaluate the utility of this combination as part of an NST regimen in EBC. Patients and methods: Patients with untreated operable T2-T4a-c N0-2 M0 breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either four cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (q3w) followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AP-D) or four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) q3w followed by four cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w (AC-D). Surgery was carried out within 2 months after last chemotherapy. Primary end point was pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast. Secondary end points included clinical response rate, rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes, toxicity, and disease-free survival. Results: From September 2005 to August 2007, 257 patients were randomly allocated to 17 sites. Median age was 48 and 49 years for AP-D and AC-D, respectively. Overall pCR rates were 16.5% for AP-D and 20.2% for AC-D. With AP-D, pCR rate was 17.8% for hormone receptor (HR)-negative patients and 15.9% for HR-positive patients. With AC-D, pCR rates were 42.9% and 7.8% for HR-negative and HR-positive patients, respectively. Clinical response rates were 59.5% in the AP-D group and 68.1% in the AC-D group. The rate of histologically negative axillary lymph nodes was 53% in both groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. Median disease-free survival is currently not mature. Conclusions: AP-D and AC-D are well tolerated and active as NST in EBC. Of note, AC-D had a higher pCR rate in HR-negative tumors, whereas AP-D had more activity if HRs were expressed.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 617
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ten year follow-up of BCIRG-006 comparing doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC→T) with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab (AC→TH) with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) in HER2+early breast cancer
    Slamon, D. J.
    Eiermann, W.
    Robert, N. J.
    Giermek, J.
    Martin, M.
    Jasiowka, M.
    Mackey, J. R.
    Chan, A.
    Liu, M-C
    Pinter, T.
    Valero, V.
    Falkson, C.
    Fornander, T.
    Shiftan, T. A.
    Bensfia, S.
    Hitler, S.
    Xu, N.
    Bee-Munteanu, V.
    Drevot, P.
    Press, M. F.
    Crown, J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [22] A dose-dense schedule of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer: results from a phase II study
    Antolin, Silvia
    Mel, Ramon
    Ramos, Manuel
    Garcia-Palomo, Andres
    Almanza, Concepcion
    de Paz, Laura
    Calvo, Lourdes
    Alvarez, Elena
    Gonzalez, Ana
    Garcia-Mata, Jesus
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (09): : 686 - 691
  • [23] A randomized phase II trial comparing docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer: Kanagawa Breast Oncology Croup (KBOG) 1101 study
    Ishikawa, Takashi
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Tanabe, Mikiko
    Oba, Mad S.
    Sasaki, Takeshi
    Morita, Satoshi
    Kida, Kumiko
    Nawata, Shuichi
    Mogaki, Masatoshi
    Doi, Takako
    Tsugawa, Koichiro
    Ogata, Haruki
    Kosaka, Yoshimasa
    Sengoku, Norihiko
    Suzuki, Yasuhiro
    Suto, Akihiko
    Chishima, Takashi
    Ichikawa, Yasushi
    Endo, Itaru
    Tokuda, Yutaka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [24] Sequential doxorubicin plus vinorelbine (AV) followed by docetaxel plus carboplatin (DC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer (BC)
    Santisteban, Marta
    De la Cruz, Susana
    Sola, Jesus Javier
    Aramendia, Jose Manuel
    Espinos, Jaime
    Garran, Cristina
    Martinez-Regueira, Fernando
    Zornoza, Gerardo
    Fernandez-Hidalgo, Oscar
    Nieto, Yago
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 86 - 86
  • [25] Results of Neoteam: A randomized multicenter phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride plus trastuzumab vs conventional doxorubicin both in combination with cyclophosphamide and followed by docetaxel plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive primary breast cancer
    Pernas Simon, S.
    Rezai, M.
    Hauschild, M.
    Machiels, J. P.
    Paepke, S.
    Llombart Cussac, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [26] Phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel/vinorelbine followed by surgery and adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in women with stage II/III breast cancer
    Limentani, Steven A.
    Brufsky, Adam M.
    Erban, John K.
    Jahanzeb, Mohammed
    Lewis, Deborah
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2006, 6 (06) : 511 - 517
  • [27] Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer
    Al-Tweigeri, Taher A.
    Ajarim, Dahish S.
    Alsayed, Adher A.
    Rahal, Mohamed M.
    Alshabanah, Mohamed O.
    Tulbah, Asma M.
    Al-Malik, Osama A.
    Fatani, Doha M.
    El-Husseiny, Gamal A.
    Elkum, Naser B.
    Ezzat, Adnan A.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 27 (03) : 571 - 577
  • [28] Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer
    Taher A. Al-Tweigeri
    Dahish S. Ajarim
    Adher A. Alsayed
    Mohamed M. Rahal
    Mohamed O. Alshabanah
    Asma M. Tulbah
    Osama A. Al-Malik
    Doha M. Fatani
    Gamal A. El-Husseiny
    Naser B. Elkum
    Adnan A. Ezzat
    Medical Oncology, 2010, 27 : 571 - 577
  • [29] Phase III randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC®T) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and trastuzumab (AC®TH) with docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH) in HER2 positive early breast cancer patients:: BCIRG 006 study
    Slamon, D
    Eiermann, W
    Robert, N
    Pienkowski, T
    Martin, M
    Pawlicki, M
    Chan, A
    Smylie, M
    Liu, M
    Falkson, C
    Pinter, T
    Fornander, T
    Shiftan, T
    Valero, V
    Von Minckwitz, G
    Mackey, J
    Tabah-Fisch, J
    Buyse, M
    Lindsay, MA
    Riva, A
    Bee, V
    Pegram, M
    Press, M
    Crown, J
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S5 - S5