How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it?

被引:18
|
作者
McGrath, Liam F. [1 ]
Bernauer, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Ctr Comparat & Int Studies, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Sci Technol & Policy, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
TRADE-POLICY; OPINION; ATTITUDES; CARBON; PERCEPTIONS; COOPERATION; IMPACT; GOODS; POLITICIANS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.484
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conventional wisdom holds that climate change poses a global public goods problem, thus requiring a global solution that reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions worldwide through some form of centralized target setting and burden-sharing arrangement among countries. Yet, the 2015 Paris Agreement has essentially given up on this approach, on which the 1997 Kyoto Protocol was based, and now relies on policies that are adopted unilaterally and voluntarily by individual countries. Since ambitious climate policies are very unlikely to be enacted and effectively implemented without strong public support, research is beginning to explore how strong public support is for unilateral climate policy and what its determinants are. Recent research has developed useful survey instruments to gauge public support for unilateral climate policy. Results from surveys and survey-embedded experiments show that when respondents are confronted with cost implications and free-riding problems associated with unilateral climate policy, public support tends to drop to some extent, but still remains quite high. Current research thus shows that people are-the hitherto strong global public goods framing of climate policy not with standing-surprisingly nonreciprocal in their climate policy preferences. Preferences concerning climate policy tend to be driven primarily by a range of personal predispositions and cost considerations, which existing research has already explored quite extensively, rather than by considerations of what other countries do. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on public support for climate policy instruments must broaden its scope
    Kallbekken, Steffen
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (03) : 206 - 208
  • [42] How strong is NEA support?
    Clark, M
    [J]. DANCE MAGAZINE, 1997, 71 (09): : 26 - &
  • [43] What Shapes Public Reactions to Climate Change? Overview of Research and Policy Implications
    Patchen, Martin
    [J]. ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) : 47 - 68
  • [44] What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
    Drews, Stefan
    Van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2016, 16 (07) : 855 - 876
  • [45] Optimal containment and policy differentiation under unilateral climate policy
    Csordas, Stefan
    Krysiak, Frank C.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2011, 44 (03): : 814 - 837
  • [46] Risk: What it drives and how it is driven
    Chapman, C
    Ward, S
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING COMPLEX PROJECTS, 1997, 17 : 69 - 88
  • [47] Going green, growing strong: how climate policy boosts US companies performance
    Ramzan, Imran
    Ali, Kashif
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2024,
  • [48] Unilateral Climate Policy: Harmful or Even Disastrous?
    Ritter, Hendrik
    Schopf, Mark
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (01): : 155 - 178
  • [49] Unilateral Climate Policy: Harmful or Even Disastrous?
    Hendrik Ritter
    Mark Schopf
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 58 : 155 - 178
  • [50] Support for climate policy researchers
    Hanna, Ryan
    Dugoua, Eugenie
    Nunez-Jimenez, Alejandro
    Nock, Destenie
    Arcusa, Stephanie
    Castellanos, Sergio
    Davidson, Michael R.
    Edwards, Morgan R.
    Galeazzi, Clara
    Gao, Xue
    Graff, Michelle
    Kennedy, Kathleen M.
    Kontou, Eleftheria
    Lathwal, Priyank
    Musa, Mirko
    O'Rear, Eric
    Sivaranjani, S.
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Zhu, Qianru
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2022, 378 (6625) : 1181 - 1181