Reaction Time of Erroneous Responses in the Go/No-Go Paradigm Effects of Go Trial Probability and Memory Demand

被引:1
|
作者
Leblanc-Sirois, Yanick [1 ]
Braun, Claude M. J. [1 ]
Elie-Fortier, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Psychol, CP 8888, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
关键词
response probability; recognition memory; go/no-go; reaction time; impulsivity; response bias; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; LATENCY; BRAIN; ERROR; BIAS;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169/a000415
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Reaction time (RT) of erroneous responses in go/no-go tasks tends to be shorter than RT of correct responses. An opposite difference has been reported (Halperin, Wolf, Greenblatt, & Young, 1991) which could be attributed to differences in go trial probability, or to high memory demand. Two experiments aimed here to test these two explanations, a simultaneous matching task with low memory load (Experiment 1), and a sequential matching task with high memory load (Experiment 2). Go trial probability was also manipulated. Short false positive PT was obtained only in the sequential matching task with high go trial probability, while long false positive PT was obtained in the other three conditions. Low go trial probability and high memory load were both found to be sufficient, by themselves, to create long false positives attributable to confusion. Short false positives in the high go trial probability/low memory load condition were attributed to failure of response inhibition.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 321
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human ERPs indicative of motor suppression in an auditory Go/No-Go paradigm
    Bentley, DE
    Chen, ACN
    Crossman, AR
    Jones, AKP
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) : 136 - 136
  • [22] EFFECTS OF PRELIMINARY INFORMATION IN A GO VERSUS NO-GO TASK
    MILLER, J
    SCHAFFER, R
    HACKLEY, SA
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1991, 76 (03) : 241 - 292
  • [23] Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: A psychophysiological analysis
    Miller, JO
    Low, K
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2001, 27 (02) : 266 - 289
  • [24] Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance
    Wiemers, Elizabeth A.
    Redick, Thomas S.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2019, 71 : 39 - 58
  • [25] Reaction time and brain oscillations in Go/No-go tasks with different meanings of stimulus color
    Horinouchi, Takayuki
    Watanabe, Tatsunori
    Kuwabara, Takayuki
    Matsumoto, Takuya
    Yunoki, Keisuke
    Ito, Kanami
    Ishida, Haruki
    Kirimoto, Hikari
    CORTEX, 2023, 169 : 203 - 219
  • [26] The influence of the prestimulus EEG-vigilance on the reaction time in an auditory go/no-go task
    Minkwitz, J.
    Chittka, T.
    Joedicke, J.
    Olbrich, S.
    Sander, C.
    Thormann, J.
    Hegerl, U.
    Himmerich, H.
    PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2011, 44 (06)
  • [27] MEG study of occipital lobe function changes according to task demand using a visual Go/No-Go paradigm
    Takei, Y
    Kumano, S
    Hattori, S
    Uehara, T
    Fukuda, M
    Mikuni, M
    UNVEILING THE MYSTERY OF THE BRAIN: NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BRAIN FUNCTION, 2005, 1278 : 173 - 176
  • [28] Neurocognitive correlates of processing food-related stimuli in a Go/No-go paradigm
    Watson, Todd D.
    Garvey, Katherine T.
    APPETITE, 2013, 71 : 40 - 47
  • [29] Interstimulus contingency facilitates saccadic responses in a bimodal go/no-go task
    Kirchner, H
    Colonius, H
    COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (01): : 261 - 272
  • [30] POTENTIAL RELATED TO NO-GO REACTION IN GO NO-GO HAND MOVEMENT WITH DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN TONE STIMULI OF DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES IN THE MONKEY
    GEMBA, H
    SASAKI, K
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 537 (1-2) : 340 - 344