Combined laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in selected patients

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Liwei [1 ]
Wang, Zhenghui [1 ]
Zhang, Youyun [1 ]
Zhang, Chi [1 ]
Yu, Shicheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Urol, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; flexible ureteroscopy; ureteral stone; renal stone; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; CALCULI; TRANSPERITONEAL; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this study is to report our experience of combined laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in selected patients and evaluated its advantages and potential. Methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients who underwent combined LU and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones and ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in our department from January 2014 to April 2017. For each patient, detailed medical history, demographics, and stone characteristics were collected. Procedure-related parameters, including stone-free rate, operation time, hospital stay after surgery, duration of drainage, mean estimated blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and complication rate, were evaluated. Results: The mean size of ureteral stones was 20.13 +/- 4.01 mm. The mean number of stones removed per patient was 4 (range: 2-7). All the procedures were completed laparoscopically with no open conversions. The total SFR was 90.3%, and the SFR of ureteral stones was 100%. The operation time was 110.4 +/- 26.5 minutes. Median hospital stay after surgery was 4 (range: 3-6) days, and the median duration of drainage was 4 (range: 3-5) days. The mean estimated blood loss was 16.5 +/- 9.1 mL. The mean VAS scores obtained at 24 and 48 hours after surgery were 2.53 +/- 0.91 and 1.08 +/- 0.45, respectively. No intraoperative complications were noted. The complication rate was 29.0%. Prolonged urine leakage was not detected. No ureteral strictures were detected in patients at follow-up visits 12 months after surgery. Conclusion: As a safe and minimally-invasive procedure, combined LU and flexible ureteroscopy is suitable for removing large upper ureteral stones along with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones. It provided high SFRs and low complication rates in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:13657 / 13662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy as a treatment strategy before flexible ureteroscopy for impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis
    Anan, Go
    Kudo, Daisuke
    Matsuoka, Toshimitsu
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Sato, Makoto
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (10) : 3756 - 3765
  • [42] Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy, and mini-percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of large proximal ureteral stones (1.5-2 cm): A prospective randomized trial
    Zoeir, A.
    Zaghloul, T.
    Mamdoh, H.
    Mousa, A.
    Gameel, T.
    Eltatawy, H.
    Ragab, M.
    Abo-Elenein, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S514 - S514
  • [43] COMPARISON OF TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY, RETROGRADE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY, AND MINI-PERCUTANEOUS ANTEGRADE URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE PROXIMAL URETERAL STONES (1.5-2 CM): A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    Zoeir, Ahmed
    Zaghloul, Talaat
    Mamdoh, Hussein
    Mousa, Ayman
    Gameel, Tarek
    ElTatawy, Hasan
    Ragab, Maged
    Abo-Elenein, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E481 - E481
  • [44] Efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of large proximal ureteric stones and its impact on renal function
    Yasui, Takahiro
    Okada, Atsushi
    Hamamoto, Shuzo
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Ando, Ryosuke
    Mizuno, Kentaro
    Itoh, Yasunori
    Tozawa, Keiichi
    Hayashi, Yutaro
    Kohri, Kenjiro
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 : 1 - 6
  • [45] Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Jingdong
    Chang, Xueliang
    Wang, Yaxuan
    Han, Zhenwei
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [46] A novel laparoscopic ureterolithotomy with renal stone removal using a rigid nephroscope and ultrasonic lithotripter through a laparoscopic port in a patient with giant ureteral and renal stones
    Shin, Yu Seob
    You, Jae Hyung
    Kim, Myung Ki
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 82 (05) : 351 - 352
  • [47] Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
    Hu, Henglong
    Lu, Yuchao
    He, Deng
    Cui, Lei
    Zhang, Jiaqiao
    Zhao, Zhenyu
    Qin, Baolong
    Wang, Yufeng
    Lin, Feng
    Wang, Shaogang
    UROLITHIASIS, 2016, 44 (05) : 427 - 434
  • [48] The Prime Time for Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Renal Stones Is Coming: Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy No Longer Needed?
    Tonyali, Senol
    Haberal, Hakan Bahadir
    Esperto, Francesco
    Hamid, Zeeshan
    Tzelves, Lazaros
    Pietropaolo, Amelia
    Emilianl, Esteban
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (05) : 280 - 284
  • [49] Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly
    Henglong Hu
    Yuchao Lu
    Deng He
    Lei Cui
    Jiaqiao Zhang
    Zhenyu Zhao
    Baolong Qin
    Yufeng Wang
    Feng Lin
    Shaogang Wang
    Urolithiasis, 2016, 44 : 427 - 434
  • [50] Which is better for renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney: shockwave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy?
    Deng, N.
    Liu, P.
    Zou, Z.
    Pan, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 119 - 119