Combined laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in selected patients

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Liwei [1 ]
Wang, Zhenghui [1 ]
Zhang, Youyun [1 ]
Zhang, Chi [1 ]
Yu, Shicheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Sir Run Run Shaw Hosp, Dept Urol, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; flexible ureteroscopy; ureteral stone; renal stone; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; CALCULI; TRANSPERITONEAL; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objective of this study is to report our experience of combined laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in selected patients and evaluated its advantages and potential. Methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients who underwent combined LU and flexible ureteroscopy for removing large upper ureteral stones and ipsilateral concurrent renal stones in our department from January 2014 to April 2017. For each patient, detailed medical history, demographics, and stone characteristics were collected. Procedure-related parameters, including stone-free rate, operation time, hospital stay after surgery, duration of drainage, mean estimated blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and complication rate, were evaluated. Results: The mean size of ureteral stones was 20.13 +/- 4.01 mm. The mean number of stones removed per patient was 4 (range: 2-7). All the procedures were completed laparoscopically with no open conversions. The total SFR was 90.3%, and the SFR of ureteral stones was 100%. The operation time was 110.4 +/- 26.5 minutes. Median hospital stay after surgery was 4 (range: 3-6) days, and the median duration of drainage was 4 (range: 3-5) days. The mean estimated blood loss was 16.5 +/- 9.1 mL. The mean VAS scores obtained at 24 and 48 hours after surgery were 2.53 +/- 0.91 and 1.08 +/- 0.45, respectively. No intraoperative complications were noted. The complication rate was 29.0%. Prolonged urine leakage was not detected. No ureteral strictures were detected in patients at follow-up visits 12 months after surgery. Conclusion: As a safe and minimally-invasive procedure, combined LU and flexible ureteroscopy is suitable for removing large upper ureteral stones along with ipsilateral concurrent renal stones. It provided high SFRs and low complication rates in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:13657 / 13662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy and flexible cystoscopy in the treatment of concurrent large upper ureteral and renal stones
    Su, Jian
    Zhu, Qingyi
    Yuan, Lin
    Zhang, Yang
    Zhang, Qingling
    Wei, Yunfei
    Shen, Luming
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (04) : 314 - 318
  • [2] Flexible ureteroscopic renal stone extraction during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in patients with large upper ureteral stone and small renal stones
    You, Jae Hyung
    Kim, Young Gon
    Kim, Myung Ki
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 8 (9-10): : E591 - E594
  • [3] Removal of asymptomatic ipsilateral renal stones following rigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones
    Bilgasem, S
    Pace, KT
    Dyer, S
    Honey, RJD
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (06) : 397 - 400
  • [4] REMOVAL OF ASYMPTOMATIC IPSILATERAL RENAL STONES FOLLOWING RIGID URETEROSCOPY FOR URETERAL STONES
    Ahmadnia, H.
    Yarmohamadi, A.
    Imani, M.
    Shokohian, M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A116 - A116
  • [5] REMOVAL OF ASYMPTOMATIC IPSILATERAL RENAL STONES FOLLOWING RIGID URETEROSCOPY FOR URETERAL STONES
    Ahmadnia, Hassan
    Yarmohamadi, Aliasghar
    Imanee, Mohamad Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A257 - A257
  • [6] THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHOTOMY FOR IMPACTED UPPER URETERAL STONES
    Abdullajanov, Murod M.
    Rashidov, Maksudhon M.
    Ahmedov, Rustam N.
    Rahimov, Murodil R.
    Halilov, Muhsin L.
    Maksumov, Kamal D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A339 - A339
  • [7] Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy vs Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Large Ureteral Stones
    Choi, Ae Duck
    Seo, Seong Il
    Kwon, Joonbeom
    Kim, Bum Soo
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (02)
  • [8] Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Ureterolithotomy in Impacted and Very Large Ureteral Stones
    Bayar, Goksel
    Tanriverdi, Orhan
    Taskiran, Mehmet
    Sariogullari, Umut
    Acinikli, Huseyin
    Abdullayev, Elshad
    Horasanli, Kaya
    Miroglu, Cengiz
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (02) : 1423 - 1428
  • [9] Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones >15 mm: A Single Surgeon Experience
    Tugcu, Volkan
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Atar, Arda
    Kocakaya, Ramazan
    Eksi, Mithat
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [10] FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR RENAL AND UPPER URETERAL STONES
    Nutahara, Kikuo
    Sugata, Akio
    Hayashi, Kenjirou
    Itaya, Naosu
    Hara, Hidhiko
    Yamaguchi, Takeshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Tanbo, Mitsuhiro
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Higashihara, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A261 - A262