Salience-based progression of visual attention: Time course

被引:5
|
作者
Couffe, C. [1 ]
Mizzi, R. [1 ]
Michael, G. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 2, Dept Psychol Cognit & Neuropsychol, Lab Etud Mecanismes Cognitifs EA 3082, 5 Ave Pierre Mendes France, F-69676 Bron, France
来源
PSYCHOLOGIE FRANCAISE | 2016年 / 61卷 / 03期
关键词
Visual attention; Salience; Time course; Attentional spotlight; Zoom lens model; SPATIAL ATTENTION; EYE-MOVEMENTS; TOP-DOWN; CAPTURE; INTERFERENCE; RESISTANCE; SINGLE; SHIFTS; COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.psfr.2015.04.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a visual search task, visual attention progresses from the most to the least salient item until a target is found. The time course of such salience-based progression remains unclear although the temporal deployment seems as crucial as the spatial deployment. The present study investigated how the general hierarchical pattern takes place. Healthy volunteers were presented with a primed visual search paradigm in which the primes consisted of three items differing in salience for either 33, 50 or 100 ms. Subsequently one of them became the target and participants had to make a judgment about it. In order to progress on the basis of salience, attention seemed first to be captured by the most salient item. Secondly, the first two most salient items seemed both encompassed within the attentional spotlight. At that time, the least salient item seemed inhibited, completing the stepwise progression of attention. In summary, our data suggest that the hierarchical pattern is built up over time through orienting and expansion of the spotlight, and inhibition of the least salient signals. Furthermore, complementary analyses revealed a proximity effect influencing the selection of the next location to visit. As predicted by different computational models, items located closely to the first-visited location were more prone to attract attention than distant items but interestingly enough, this effect only applied to the least salient item suggesting a balance between salience and proximity criteria. Critically also, salience and proximity effects seem to have different time courses. Results are only partially explained by current visual attention models and require further investigation. 2015 Societe Francaise de Psychologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 175
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture
    Anderson, Brian A.
    Laurent, Patryk A.
    Yantis, Steven
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [22] On the priority of salience-based interpretations: The case of sarcastic irony
    Fein, Ofer
    Yeari, Menahem
    Giora, Rachel
    [J]. INTERCULTURAL PRAGMATICS, 2015, 12 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [23] The time course of covert visual attention shift
    Shih, S
    Sperling, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 2095 - 2095
  • [24] Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course
    Egeth, HE
    Yantis, S
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 48 : 269 - 297
  • [25] Time course of visual attention with emotional faces
    Priyanka Srivastava
    Narayanan Srinivasan
    [J]. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2010, 72 : 369 - 377
  • [26] Time course of visual attention with emotional faces
    Srivastava, Priyanka
    Srinivasan, Narayanan
    [J]. ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) : 369 - 377
  • [27] The slow time-course of visual attention
    Ward, R
    Duncan, J
    Shapiro, K
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 30 (01) : 79 - 109
  • [28] Salience-based Distributed Controllers Placement in Software Defined Networks
    Hirayama, Takahiro
    Miyazawa, Takaya
    Al Muktadir, Abu Hena
    Harai, Hiroaki
    Kafle, Ved P.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2018,
  • [29] Salience-Based Edge Selection in Flicker and Binocular Color Vision
    Anstis, Stuart
    Hong, Grace
    Ho, Alan
    [J]. I-PERCEPTION, 2020, 11 (03):
  • [30] The time course of salience: not entirely caused by salience
    Alexander Krüger
    Ingrid Scharlau
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2022, 86 : 234 - 251