Sensor-Based Electromagnetic Navigation to Facilitate Implantation of Left Ventricular Leads in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

被引:11
|
作者
Doering, Michael [1 ]
Sommer, Philipp [1 ]
Rolf, Sascha [1 ]
Lucas, Johannes [1 ]
Breithardt, Ole A. [1 ]
Hindricks, Gerhard [1 ]
Richter, Sergio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Ctr Heart, Dept Electrophysiol, D-04289 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
cardiac resynchronization therapy; electromagnetic navigation; heart failure; lead position; radiation exposure; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; TASK-FORCE; EXPERIENCE; SYSTEM; PATIENT; TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; ABLATION; IMAGE;
D O I
10.1111/jce.12550
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Electromagnetic Navigation for CRT Implantation IntroductionImplantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices can be challenging, time consuming, and fluoroscopy intense. To facilitate placement of left ventricular (LV) leads, a novel electromagnetic navigation system (MediGuide, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) has been developed, displaying real-time 3-D location of sensor-embedded delivery tools superimposed on prerecorded X-ray cine-loops of coronary sinus venograms. We report our experience and advanced progress in the use of this new electromagnetic tracking system to guide LV lead implantation. Methods and ResultsBetween January 2012 and December 2013, 71 consecutive patients (69 9 years, 76% male) were implanted with a CRT device using the new electromagnetic tracking system. Demographics, procedural data, and periprocedural adverse events were gathered. The impact of the operator's experience, optimized workflow, and improved software technology on procedural data were analyzed. LV lead implantation was successfully achieved in all patients without severe adverse events. Total procedure time measured 87 +/- 37 minutes and the median total fluoroscopy time (skin-to-skin) was 4.9 (2.5-7.8) minutes with a median dose-area-product of 476 (260-1056) cGy*cm(2). An additional comparison with conventional CRT device implantations showed a significant reduction in fluoroscopy time from 8.0 (5.8; 11.5) to 4.5 (2.8; 7.3) minutes (P = 0.016) and radiation dose from 603 (330; 969) to 338 (176; 680) cGy*cm(2), respectively (P = 0.044 ). ConclusionUse of the new navigation system enables safe and successful LV lead placement with improved orientation and significantly reduced radiation exposure during CRT implantation.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 175
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bipolar versus quadripolar left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: evidence to date
    Fyenbo, Daniel Benjamin
    Frausing, Maria Hee Jung Park
    Kronborg, Mads Brix
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2021, 19 (12) : 1075 - 1084
  • [22] Optimal timing for initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy with left ventricular epicardial pacing leads
    El Sabbagh, Firas H.
    Prabhakaran, Anbazhagan
    Tchou, Patrick J.
    Van Wagoner, David R.
    Navia, Jose L.
    Chung, Mina K.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 674 - 674
  • [23] The Use of Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads Improves the Hemodynamic Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Osca, Joaquin
    Alonso, Pau
    Cano, Oscar
    Miguel Sanchez, Juan
    Tejada, David
    Andres, Ana
    Sancho Tello, Maria Jose
    Olaguee, Jose
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (03): : 326 - 333
  • [24] Orthodromic and Antidromic Snare Techniques for Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Kim, Juwon
    Lee, Sung Ho
    Kim, Hye Ree
    Chung, Tae-Wan
    Choi, Ji-Hoon
    Kim, Ju Youn
    Park, Kyoung-Min
    On, Young Keun
    Kim, June Soo
    Park, Seung-Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [25] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy After Prophylactic Epicardial Leads Implantation During Concomitant Cardiac Surgery: Impact on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes
    Senechal, Mario
    Marceau, Aude
    Philippon, Francois
    Sarrazin, Jean-Francois
    Charbonneau, Eric
    Jacques, Frederic
    Cinq-Mars, Alexandre
    Dagenais, Francois
    Leroux, Emilie
    Voisine, Pierre
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [26] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy After Prophylactic Epicardial Leads Implantation During Concomitant Cardiac Surgery: Impact on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes
    Senechal, Mario
    Marceau, Aude
    Philippon, Francois
    Sarrazin, Jean-Francois
    Charbonneau, Eric
    Jacques, Frederic
    Cinq-Mars, Alexandre
    Dagenais, Francois
    Leroux, Emilie
    Voisine, Pierre
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2016, 134
  • [27] Is the left ventricular lateral wall the best lead implantation site for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Gasparini, M
    Mantica, M
    Galimberti, P
    Bocciolone, M
    Genovese, L
    Mangiavacchi, M
    La Marchesina, U
    Faletra, F
    Klersy, C
    Coates, R
    Gronda, E
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 26 (01): : 162 - 168
  • [28] Using multiple buddy wires to facilitate left ventricular lead advancement in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Yuan-Hung Liu
    Ling-Ping Lai
    Jiunn-Lee Lin
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2007, 18 : 239 - 241
  • [29] Using multiple buddy wires to facilitate left ventricular lead advancement in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Liu, Yuan-Hung
    Lai, Ling-Ping
    Lin, Jiunn-Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) : 239 - 241
  • [30] Effect of Continued Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Schleifer, John William
    Mookadam, Farouk
    Kransdorf, Evan P.
    Nanda, Udai
    Adams, Jonathon C.
    Cha, Stephen
    Pajaro, Octavio E.
    Steidley, David Eric
    Scott, Robert L.
    Carvajal, Tomas
    Saadiq, Rayya A.
    Srivathsan, Komandoor
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (04): : 556 - 559