The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system - What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved?

被引:44
|
作者
Polonen, Ismo [1 ]
Hokkanen, Pekka
Jalava, Kimmo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Law, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, FIN-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Environmental impact assessment; Effectiveness; EIA legislation; Public participation; Environmental policy instruments; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article summarises the results of a multidisciplinary research project on the effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system. It examines the main strengths and weaknesses of EIA as a preventive and participatory environmental management tool. The study concludes that EIA has achieved a meaningful role in the environmental policy toolbox in Finland and has clearly enhanced the possibilities for high-quality environmental decision making. The research cites the liaison authority system as a clear strength of the Finnish EIA system in its enabling a single regional authority to specialise in and gain wide experience on EIA issues. In examining potential weaknesses of the regime, the article concludes that the key constraint on EIA effectiveness is inadequacy of the action-forcing mechanisms at the decision-making phase. The primary means to improve the effectiveness of EIA would be to strengthen the legal provisions on development consents. On the whole, the research indicates that the EU and Finnish legislation and guidance on environmental impact assessment provide a good framework for effective utilisation of the instrument. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mob Programming - What Works, What Doesn't
    Wilson, Alexander
    AGILE PROCESSES, IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, AND EXTREME PROGRAMMING, XP 2015, 2015, 212 : 319 - 325
  • [22] MANAGING FIBROMYALGIA: WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN'T
    Hauser, Winfried
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 : 9 - 9
  • [23] Results of pollicisation: what works and what doesn’t
    Michael Tonkin
    BMC Proceedings, 9 (Suppl 3)
  • [24] The American city: What works, what doesn't - Garvin,A
    Cameron, M
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1996, 16 (02) : 148 - 149
  • [25] Veterinary Marketing-What Works and What Doesn't
    Bankstahl, Thomas
    Bourke, Ann
    Crupi, Louis
    Greenberg, Tia
    Rhody, Jeff
    Velasco, Michele
    JOURNAL OF AVIAN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2009, 23 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [26] Connecting Care in the Community: what works and what doesn't
    Lucas, Elizabeth
    Halcomb, Elizabeth
    McCarthy, Sandra
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH, 2016, 22 (06) : 539 - 544
  • [27] Models of adoption support: What works and what doesn't
    Prynn, B
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2003, 33 (07): : 981 - 983
  • [28] Prudential supervision: What works and what doesn't.
    Goodhart, C
    ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2002, 112 (483): : F594 - F596
  • [29] AFS Annual Meetings: What Works and What Doesn't
    Austen, Doug
    FISHERIES, 2016, 41 (03) : 113 - 113
  • [30] Student outcomes assessment - What works and what doesn't
    Fitzgerald, S
    McDonald, M
    Kubilus, NJ
    Fienup, M
    Lopez, D
    SIGCSE 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 32 (01): : 405 - 406