The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system - What works, what doesn't, and what could be improved?

被引:44
|
作者
Polonen, Ismo [1 ]
Hokkanen, Pekka
Jalava, Kimmo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Law, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, FIN-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Environmental impact assessment; Effectiveness; EIA legislation; Public participation; Environmental policy instruments; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The article summarises the results of a multidisciplinary research project on the effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system. It examines the main strengths and weaknesses of EIA as a preventive and participatory environmental management tool. The study concludes that EIA has achieved a meaningful role in the environmental policy toolbox in Finland and has clearly enhanced the possibilities for high-quality environmental decision making. The research cites the liaison authority system as a clear strength of the Finnish EIA system in its enabling a single regional authority to specialise in and gain wide experience on EIA issues. In examining potential weaknesses of the regime, the article concludes that the key constraint on EIA effectiveness is inadequacy of the action-forcing mechanisms at the decision-making phase. The primary means to improve the effectiveness of EIA would be to strengthen the legal provisions on development consents. On the whole, the research indicates that the EU and Finnish legislation and guidance on environmental impact assessment provide a good framework for effective utilisation of the instrument. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:120 / 128
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What Works and What Doesn't
    Tepas, Joseph J., III
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (04): : S190 - S190
  • [2] What if 'What Works' Doesn't?
    Lehmann, Erika R.
    EVALUATION, 2015, 21 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [3] Panel Discussion: Remedy Effectiveness: What Works, What Doesn't?
    Zeller, Craig
    Cushing, Bradford
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 2 (01) : 75 - 79
  • [4] Verification: What works and what doesn't
    Bacchini, F
    Damiano, R
    Bentley, B
    Baty, K
    Normoyle, K
    Ishii, M
    Yogev, E
    41ST DESIGN AUTOMATION CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS 2004, 2004, : 274 - 274
  • [5] Interventions: what works, what doesn't?
    Reynolds, S
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2000, 50 (05): : 315 - 319
  • [6] Teaching psychopharmacology - What works and what doesn't
    Zisook, Sidney
    Glick, Ira D.
    Jefferson, James W.
    Wagner, Karen Dineen
    Salzman, Carl
    Peselow, Eric D.
    Stahl, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 28 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [7] Getting to Diversity: What Works and What Doesn't
    Chang, Edward H.
    SCIENCE, 2022, 377 (6612) : 1271 - 1271
  • [8] Green marketing: What works, what doesn't
    Nickel-Kailing, Gail
    Print Professional, 2010, 48 (03):
  • [9] Regional policy: what works and what doesn't
    Lall, Somik V.
    RESHAPING REGIONAL POLICY, 2011, : 41 - 56
  • [10] CHOOSING WISELY: WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOESN'T
    Barsness, G. W.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 131 : 358 - 358