Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by Chicago Classification 4.0 Compared to Chicago Classification 3.0

被引：0

作者：

Adil, Syed Ahmad ^{[1
]}

Kurin, Michael ^{[1
]}

Damjanovska, Sofi ^{[1
]}

Tanner, Samuel ^{[2
]}

Greer, Katarina ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

[2] Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA

[3] Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2021年 / 116卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

S391

引用

页码：S172 / S173

页数：2

共 50 条

[31] Changes in the Treatment of Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders Imposed by the New Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorders on High Resolution Manometry (Chicago Classification 4.0)
Herbella, Fernando A. M.
Del Grande, Leonardo M.
Schlottmann, Francisco
Patti, Marco G.
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (05) : 2017 - 2026
[32] Additional diagnostic yield of rapid drink challenge in Chicago classification version 4.0 compared with 3.0
Wang, H.
Jung, K. W.
Na, H. K.
Ahn, J. Y.
Lee, J. H.
Kim, D. H.
Choi, K. D.
Song, H. J.
Lee, G. H.
Jung, H.
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 35
[33] Relationship between ineffective esophageal motility disorder and reflux using the new Chicago 4.0 classification over a 10-year period
Kim, Y. S.
Wong, M. Y. W.
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 : 185 - 185
[34] Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0(C)
Yadlapati, Rena
Kahrilas, Peter J.
Fox, Mark R.
Bredenoord, Albert J.
Prakash Gyawali, C.
Roman, Sabine
Babaei, Arash
Mittal, Ravinder K.
Rommel, Nathalie
Savarino, Edoardo
Sifrim, Daniel
Smout, Andre
Vaezi, Michael F.
Zerbib, Frank
Akiyama, Junichi
Bhatia, Shobna
Bor, Serhat
Carlson, Dustin A.
Chen, Joan W.
Cisternas, Daniel
Cock, Charles
Coss-Adame, Enrique
de Bortoli, Nicola
Defilippi, Claudia
Fass, Ronnie
Ghoshal, Uday C.
Gonlachanvit, Sutep
Hani, Albis
Hebbard, Geoffrey S.
Wook Jung, Kee
Katz, Philip
Katzka, David A.
Khan, Abraham
Kohn, Geoffrey Paul
Lazarescu, Adriana
Lengliner, Johannes
Mittal, Sumeet K.
Omari, Taher
Park, Moo In
Penagini, Roberto
Pohl, Daniel
Richter, Joel E.
Serra, Jordi
Sweis, Rami
Tack, Jan
Tatum, Roger P.
Tutuian, Radu
Vela, Marcelo F.
Wong, Reuben K.
Wu, Justin C.
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (01):
[35] Esophageal motility disorder - has Chicago classification v4.0 simplified our management?
Edeani, Francis
Massey, Benson
CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2023, 31 (06): : 374 - 381
[36] Comparison between Chicago III and Chicago II classification in diagnosing esophageal motility disorder
Alsaegh, Ahmed
Ong, A. M. L.
Ngai, Eileen
Namasivayam, Vikneswaran
Wang, Yu Tien
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 3 - 3
[37] Comparison Between Chicago III and Chicago II Classification in Diagnosing Esophageal Motility Disorder
Alsaegh, Ahmed
Ong, Andrew Ming Liang
Wang, Yu Tien
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S290 - S290
[38] Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria
Surdea-Blaga, Teodora
Popa, Stefan-Lucian
Sabo, Cristina Maria
Farcas, Radu Alexandru
David, Liliana
Ismaiel, Abdulrahman
Dumitrascu, Dan Lucian
Grad, Simona
Leucuta, Daniel Corneliu
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (09):
[39] Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders: Past, present, and future
Kelli DeLay
Rena Yadlapati
John E. Pandolfino
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, 40 : 120 - 130
[40] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MANOMETRIC DIAGNOSIS BY CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION VERSION 3.0 AND 4.0 ON ESOPHAGEAL HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY
Wang, Yen-Po
Sung, Kuan-Yi
Liu, Pei-Yi
Lin, Hung-En
Hou, Ming-Chih
Lu, Ching-Liang
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S1068 - S1068

← 1 2 3 4 5 →