Streamlining the Quantitative Metrics Workflow at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

被引:4
|
作者
Rao, Sujaya H. [1 ]
Virarkar, Mayur [2 ]
Yang, Wei Tse [2 ]
Carter, Brett W. [2 ]
Liu, T. Alex [4 ]
Piwnica-Worms, David [3 ]
Bhosale, Priya R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Diagnost Imaging, Off Translat & Clin Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Syst Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Informat Serv Oncol Care & Res Informat Syst, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
QIAC; Response assessment; Tumor metrics; Quantitative imaging; ORDER ENTRY; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.014
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: The objective of the project was to describe an efficient workflow for quantifying and disseminating tumor imaging metrics essential for assessing tumor response in clinical therapeutic trials. The clinical research utility of integration of the workflow into the electronic health record for radiology reporting was measured before and after the intervention. Materials and Methods: A search of institutional clinical trial databases was performed to identify trials with radiology department collaborators. Investigator initiated trials, or those which lacked a standardized or automated system of collaboration with the research team were selected for the study. A web based application integrated in the electronic health record platform, the Quantitative Imaging Analysis Core (QIAC) initiative was established as a divisional resource with institutional support to provide standardized and reproducible imaging metrics across the institution. The turnaround time for radiology reports before (phase 1) and after web based application workflow (phase 2) was measured. During our test period (November 2014 to June 2015), a total of 68 requests with 37 from phase 1 and 31 from phase 2 were analyzed for patients who were enrolled in prospective clinical therapeutic interventional trials. Results: The mean turnaround time for generation of quantitative tumor metric results after implementation of the web based QIAC workflow (phase 2) was significantly lower than prior (phase 1) (15.9 +/- 21.3 vs 31.7 +/- 35.4 hours, p= 0.0005). The mean time from the scan to the preliminary assessment was 19.6 +/- 25.6 hours before and significantly reduced to 8.0 +/- 9.9 hours with implementation of web based QIAC workflow. Conclusion: Implementation of a web based QIAC workflow platform enabled significantly improved turnaround time for quantitative tumor metrics reports and enabled faster access to the reports. Key Words: QIAC; Response assessment; Tumor metrics; Quantitative imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:1401 / 1407
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metrics to evaluate the performance of cancer center leadership.
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Gasoyan, Hamlet
    Aaronson, William E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (27)
  • [42] ACCENTUAL METRICS AND QUANTITATIVE METRICS
    DOMINICY, M
    NASTA, M
    LANGUE FRANCAISE, 1993, (99): : 75 - 96
  • [43] The use of a smartphone application to improve stroke code workflow metrics: A pilot study in a comprehensive stroke centre
    Gutierrez-Zuniga, Raquel
    Ucles, Jorge
    Sanchez-Manso, Juan Carlos
    Fuentes, Blanca
    De Celis, Elena
    Ruiz-Ares, Gerardo
    Rodriguez-Pardo, Jorge
    Rigual, Ricardo
    Casado, Laura
    Alonso, Elisa
    Fernandez-Prieto, Andres
    Navia, Pedro
    Alvarez-Muelas, Alberto
    Marin, Begona
    Diez Tejedor, Exuperio
    Alonso de Lecinana, Maria
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [44] The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC), an NCI designated comprehensive cancer center
    Sun, Weijing
    Streeter, Natalie
    Mcguirk, Joseph
    Jensen, Roy
    MOLECULAR CANCER, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [45] The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC), an NCI designated comprehensive cancer center
    Weijing Sun
    Natalie Streeter
    Joseph McGuirk
    Roy Jensen
    Molecular Cancer, 22
  • [46] Stroke Metrics During Covid-19: a Comprehensive Stroke Center Experience
    de Oliveira, Lara Carvalho
    Ponciano, Ana
    da Guarda, Suzete Nascimento Farias
    Kashani, Nima
    Ganesh, Aravind
    Turner, Ashby
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [47] Occult primary breast cancer at a comprehensive cancer center
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Jeffe, Donna B.
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 185 (02) : 684 - 689
  • [48] MONCE Tracking Metrics: a comprehensive quantitative performance evaluation methodology for object tracking
    Rapko, Kenneth
    Xie, Wanlin
    Walsh, Andrew
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXXII, 2022, 12096
  • [49] Comprehensive workflow evaluation to improve medication distribution to the emergency department in an academic medical center
    Mills, Melanie J.
    Martschenko, Alec
    Gomez, Keven
    Hooker, Madison L.
    Pastoor, Charlotte
    Vest, Tyler A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2024, 81 (17) : e471 - e477
  • [50] Snapshot of an Outpatient Supportive Care Center at a Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Pimentel, Lindsey E.
    De La Cruz, Maxine
    Wong, Angelique
    Castro, Debra
    Bruera, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (04) : 433 - 436