Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0

被引:22
|
作者
Winton, M. [1 ]
Adcroft, A. [2 ]
Dunne, J. P. [1 ]
Held, I. M. [2 ]
Shevliakova, E. [1 ]
Zhao, M. [1 ]
Guo, H. [1 ]
Hurlin, W. [1 ]
Krasting, J. [1 ]
Knutson, T. [1 ]
Paynter, D. [1 ]
Silvers, L. G. [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, GFDL, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Program Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Cooperat Inst Modeling Earth Syst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
SURFACE-TEMPERATURE-CHANGE; ENERGY BUDGET CONSTRAINTS; GLOBAL ATMOSPHERE; MODEL; SIMULATIONS; DEPENDENCE; FEEDBACK; DIOXIDE; PATTERN; RUNS;
D O I
10.1029/2019MS001838
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present-day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radiative forcing. An ensemble of historical simulations with CM4.0 produces warming and heat uptake that are consistent with these observations under forcing that is at the middle of the assessed distribution. Energy budget-based methods for estimating sensitivities based on these quantities underestimate CM4.0's sensitivities when applied to its historical simulations. However, we argue using a simple attribution procedure that CM4.0's warming evolution indicates excessive transient sensitivity to greenhouse gases. This excessive sensitivity is offset prior to recent decades by excessive response to aerosol and land use changes. Plain Language Summary We evaluate the climate sensitivity of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) CM4.0 climate model. Climate sensitivity is an important factor determining the magnitude of future climate change under anthropogenic forcing. We find that CM4.0 is a high climate sensitivity model. A simple method for estimating climate sensitivity from historical changes significantly underestimates CM4.0's sensitivity when applied to CM4.0's historical simulation. However, more sophisticated methods that make use of the detailed evolution of global warming identify CM4.0 as most likely too sensitive to anthropogenic forcing.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structure and Performance of GFDL's CM4.0 Climate Model
    Held, I. M.
    Guo, H.
    Adcroft, A.
    Dunne, J. P.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Krasting, J.
    Shevliakova, E.
    Winton, M.
    Zhao, M.
    Bushuk, M.
    Wittenberg, A. T.
    Wyman, B.
    Xiang, B.
    Zhang, R.
    Anderson, W.
    Balaji, V.
    Donner, L.
    Dunne, K.
    Durachta, J.
    Gauthier, P. P. G.
    Ginoux, P.
    Golaz, J. -C.
    Griffies, S. M.
    Hallberg, R.
    Harris, L.
    Harrison, M.
    Hurlin, W.
    John, J.
    Lin, P.
    Lin, S. -J.
    Malyshev, S.
    Menzel, R.
    Milly, P. C. D.
    Ming, Y.
    Naik, V.
    Paynter, D.
    Paulot, F.
    Rammaswamy, V.
    Reichl, B.
    Robinson, T.
    Rosati, A.
    Seman, C.
    Silvers, L. G.
    Underwood, S.
    Zadeh, N.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2019, 11 (11) : 3691 - 3727
  • [2] An Investigation of the Effective Climate Sensitivity in GFDL's New Climate Models CM4.0 and SPEAR
    Zhao, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (17) : 5637 - 5660
  • [3] Performance of Two-Moment Stratiform Microphysics With Prognostic Precipitation in GFDL's CM4.0
    Guo, Huan
    Ming, Yi
    Fan, Songmiao
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zhang, Rong
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhou, Linjiong
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2022, 14 (12)
  • [4] Simple Global Ocean Biogeochemistry With Light, Iron, Nutrients and Gas Version 2 (BLINGv2): Model Description and Simulation Characteristics in GFDL's CM4.0
    Dunne, J. P.
    Bociu, I.
    Bronselaer, B.
    Guo, H.
    John, J. G.
    Krasting, J. P.
    Stock, C. A.
    Winton, M.
    Zadeh, N.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [5] Climate sensitivity and meridional overturning circulation in the late Eocene using GFDL CM2.1
    Hutchinson, David K.
    de Boer, Agatha M.
    Coxall, Helen K.
    Caballero, Rodrigo
    Nilsson, Johan
    Baatsen, Michiel
    CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2018, 14 (06) : 789 - 810
  • [6] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part IV: Idealized climate response
    Stouffer, RJ
    Broccoli, AJ
    Delworth, TL
    Dixon, KW
    Gudgel, R
    Held, I
    Hemler, R
    Knutson, T
    Lee, HC
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Soden, B
    Spelman, MJ
    Winton, M
    Zeng, F
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 723 - 740
  • [7] GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part III: Tropical pacific climate and ENSO
    Wittenberg, AT
    Rosati, A
    Lau, NC
    Ploshay, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 698 - 722
  • [8] Special section: GFDL coupled climate model CM2 - Preface
    Delworth, T
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (05) : 641 - 641
  • [9] Simulated Climate and Climate Change in the GFDL CM2.5 High-Resolution Coupled Climate Model
    Delworth, Thomas L.
    Rosati, Anthony
    Anderson, Whit
    Adcroft, Alistair J.
    Balaji, V.
    Benson, Rusty
    Dixon, Keith
    Griffies, Stephen M.
    Lee, Hyun-Chul
    Pacanowski, Ronald C.
    Vecchi, Gabriel A.
    Wittenberg, Andrew T.
    Zeng, Fanrong
    Zhang, Rong
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2012, 25 (08) : 2755 - 2781
  • [10] Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity Obtained From Multimillennial Runs of Two GFDL Climate Models
    Paynter, D.
    Frolicher, T. L.
    Horowitz, L. W.
    Silvers, L. G.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2018, 123 (04) : 1921 - 1941