A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing THUNDERBEAT to the Maryland LigaSure energy device in laparoscopic left colon surgery

被引:3
|
作者
Milsom, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Trencheva, Koianka [1 ]
Momose, Kota [1 ]
Peev, Miroslav P. [1 ]
Christos, Paul [2 ]
Shukla, Parul J. [1 ]
Garrett, Kelly [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Sect Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Dept Healthcare Policy Res, New York, NY USA
关键词
THUNDERBEAT; Surgery; Energy devices; ULTRASONIC COAGULATING SHEARS; DISSECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08765-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The THUNDERBEAT is a multi-functional energy device which delivers both ultrasonic and bipolar energy, but there are no randomized trials which can provide more rigorous evaluation of the clinical performance of THUNDERBEAT compared to other energy-based devices in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of THUNDERBEAT energy device to Maryland LigaSure in patients undergoing left laparoscopic colectomy. Methods Prospective randomized trial with two groups: Group 1 THUNDERBEAT and Group 2 LigaSure in a single university hospital. 60 Subjects, male and female, of age 18 years and above undergoing left colectomy for cancer or diverticulitis were included. The primary outcome was dissection time to specimen removal (DTSR) measured in minutes from the start of colon mobilization to specimen removal from the abdominal cavity. Versatility (composite of five variables) was measured by a score system from 1 to 5 (1 being worst and 5 the best), and adjusted/weighted by coefficient of importance with distribution of the importance as follow: hemostasis 0.275, sealing 0.275, cutting 0.2, dissection 0.15, and tissue manipulation 0.1. Other variables were: dryness of surgical field, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and mortality. Follow-up time was 30 days. Results 60 Patients completed surgery, 31 in Group 1 and 29 in Group 2. There was no difference in the DTSR between the groups, 91 min vs. 77 min (p = 0.214). THUNDERBEAT showed significantly higher score in dissecting and tissue manipulation in segment 3 (omental dissection), and in overall versatility score (p = 0.007) as well as versatility score in Segment 2 (retroperitoneal dissection p = 0.040) and Segment 3 (p = 0.040). No other differences were noted between the groups. Conclusions Both energy devices can be employed effectively and safely in dividing soft tissue and sealing mesenteric blood vessels during laparoscopic left colon surgery, with THUNDERBEAT demonstrating some advantages over LigaSure during omental dissection and tissue manipulation. ClinicalTrial.gov # NCT02628093.
引用
收藏
页码:4265 / 4274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing THUNDERBEAT to the Maryland LigaSure energy device in laparoscopic left colon surgery
    Jeffrey W. Milsom
    Koianka Trencheva
    Kota Momose
    Miroslav P. Peev
    Paul Christos
    Parul J. Shukla
    Kelly Garrett
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 4265 - 4274
  • [2] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING THUNDERBEAT(TB, OLYMPUS, JAPAN) TO THE MARYLAND LIGASURE™ (MEDTRONIC, USA) ENERGY DEVICE DURING LAPAROSCOPIC COLON SURGERY.
    Milsom, J. W.
    Trencheva, K.
    Momose, K.
    Peev, M.
    Shukla, P.
    Garrett, K.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (06) : E353 - E353
  • [3] Institutional variation in survival and morbidity in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: From the data of a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery (JCOG0404)
    Katayama, Hiroshi
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Mizusawa, Junki
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Akagi, Tomonori
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Okajima, Masazumi
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Okuda, Junji
    Shida, Dai
    Kanemitsu, Yukihide
    Kitano, Seigo
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 5 (06): : 823 - 831
  • [4] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    KUM, CK
    NGOI, SS
    GOH, PMY
    TEKANT, Y
    ISAAC, JR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (12) : 1599 - 1600
  • [5] A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Kuipers, N. C.
    de Kleijn, B. J.
    Wedman, J.
    van der Laan, B. F. A. M.
    Plaat, B. E. C.
    Halmos, G. B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (12) : 4987 - 4996
  • [6] LigaSure versus Conventional Hemostasis in Thyroid Surgery: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Singh, Prabhjyot
    O'Connell, Daniel
    Langille, Moran
    Dziegielewski, Peter
    Allegretto, Michael
    Harris, Jeffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 39 (04): : 378 - 384
  • [7] A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    N. C. Kuipers
    B. J. de Kleijn
    J. Wedman
    B. F. A. M. van der Laan
    B. E. C. Plaat
    G. B. Halmos
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 4987 - 4996
  • [8] The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer
    McCombie, Andrew M.
    Frizelle, Frank
    Bagshaw, Philip Frederick
    Frampton, Chris M.
    Hewett, Peter J.
    McMurrick, Paul John
    Rieger, Nicholas
    Solomon, Michael J.
    Stevenson, Andrew R.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (10) : 1156 - 1162
  • [9] A prospective trial evaluating the clinical performance of a novel surgical energy device in laparoscopic colon surgery
    Milsom, J. W.
    Trencheva, K.
    Sonoda, T.
    Nandakumar, G.
    Shukla, P. J.
    Lee, S.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (05): : 1161 - 1166
  • [10] A prospective trial evaluating the clinical performance of a novel surgical energy device in laparoscopic colon surgery
    J. W. Milsom
    K. Trencheva
    T. Sonoda
    G. Nandakumar
    P. J. Shukla
    S. Lee
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 1161 - 1166