Comparison Between Deltascan Single Channel Electroencephalography (EEG), Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) Score and Clinical Assessment in Diagnosing Delirium in Intubated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

被引:0
|
作者
Aben, Juul [1 ]
Pouwels, Sjaak [2 ]
Oldenbeuving, Annemarie [3 ]
机构
[1] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Crit Care, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Intens Care Med, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
complications; cam-icu; intensive care; monitoring; electroencephalography; delirium; TOOLS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.26449
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this article is to assess the feasibility of using single-channel electroencephalography (EEG) measurement for detecting delirium in intubated Intensive care (ICU) patients and to assess the level of agreement between the EEG measurements, the CAM-ICU score and the clinical diagnosis of delirium. Materials and methods This study was an exploratory pilot between May 2021 and September 2021 including intubated patients in the ICU. For this study the Prolira (R) (Arnhem, The Netherlands) Deltascan single-channel EEG was used and compared with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU and the clinical diagnosis of delirium by ICU physicians. Results In total 23 patients were found eligible for this study, of which 20 were included in the final analysis. The patients mean age was 63.0 +/- 8.8 years, and the majority (thirteen) was male (65%). In total 17 of the 20 patients (85%) received the diagnosis delirium by the medical team. There were no statistically significant differences between the Deltascan and CAM-ICU measurements in diagnosing delirium per time point (p values respectively 0.21; 0.90; 0.34; 0.11; 0.056 and 0.091). AUCs for the agreement between the CAM-ICU and the Deltascan measurements were respectively: 0.676 +/- 0.205; 0.333 +/- 0.224; 0.402 +/- 0.146; 0.488 +/- 0.202; 0.06 +/- 0.077 and 0.06 +/- 0.109 (all p>0.05). AUCs for the level of agreement between the clinical diagnosis delirium and Deltascan were: 0.676 +/- 0.152; 0.686 +/- 0.146; 0.711 +/- 0.132; 0.688 +/- 0.136; 0.500 +/- 0.158 and 0.700 +/- 0.211 (all p>0.05). Conclusion In this exploratory study, we showed that there is no statistical agreement between CAM-ICU and Delta scan measurements. Secondly, there is a higher agreement, although not statistically significant between the clinical diagnoses of a delirium (by a clinician) with the Deltascan measurements. Despite this small study we think that the Deltascan can be of additional value in intubated ICU patients and therefore larger studies are needed to substantiate our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of the CAM-ICU and the NEECHAM Confusion Scale in intensive care delirium assessment: an observational study in non-intubated patients
    Van Rompaey, Bart
    Schuurmans, Marieke J.
    Shortridge-Baggett, Lillie M.
    Truijen, Steven
    Elseviers, Monique
    Bossaert, Leo
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 12 (01):
  • [32] Implementation and reliability testing of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) in trauma patients.
    Pandharipande, Pratik P.
    Soja, Stacie
    Fleming, Sloan
    Cotton, Bryan
    Ely, E. Wesley
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (12) : A52 - A52
  • [33] The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
    Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri
    Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira
    Chalhub, Ricardo Avila
    Quarantini, Lucas C.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (04):
  • [34] The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
    Dimitri Gusmao-Flores
    Jorge Ibrain Figueira Salluh
    Ricardo Ávila Chalhub
    Lucas C Quarantini
    [J]. Critical Care, 16
  • [35] Assessment of delirium in intensive care using the CAM-ICU
    R Shetty
    K Reid
    [J]. Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):
  • [36] Fluctuations of consciousness after stroke: Associations with the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and potential undetected delirium
    Reznik, Michael E.
    Daiello, Lori A.
    Thompson, Bradford B.
    Wendell, Linda C.
    Mahta, Ali
    Potter, N. Stevenson
    Yaghi, Shadi
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Fehnel, Corey R.
    Furie, Karen L.
    Jones, Richard N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 56 : 58 - 62
  • [37] Comparison of the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for Delirium Detection in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients
    Linstrum, K.
    Nuzzo, E.
    Curtis, B.
    Rapport, S.
    McVerry, B. J.
    Girard, T. D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [38] Delirium in intensive care: use of the 'Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit' by the nurse
    Gomes de Oliveira Tostes, Isabel Cristina
    Maciqueira Pereira, Sandra Regina
    de Almeida, Luana Ferreira
    dos Santos, Manasses Moura
    [J]. REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2018, 10 (01): : 2 - 8
  • [39] The predictive value of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit and intensive care delirium screening checklist for delirium in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Diao, Yujie
    Yu, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Qin
    Chen, Xiaoli
    [J]. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024,
  • [40] Evaluation of a pharmacist assessed confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) vs a nursing assessed CAM-ICU.
    Mackley, Livia
    Catlin, Jennifer
    Derenski, Karrie
    Lewis, Amy
    Seratt, Michelle
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 35 (05): : E86 - E86