Comparison Between Deltascan Single Channel Electroencephalography (EEG), Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) Score and Clinical Assessment in Diagnosing Delirium in Intubated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

被引:0
|
作者
Aben, Juul [1 ]
Pouwels, Sjaak [2 ]
Oldenbeuving, Annemarie [3 ]
机构
[1] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Crit Care, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Intens Care Med, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Elisabeth Tweesteden Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
complications; cam-icu; intensive care; monitoring; electroencephalography; delirium; TOOLS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.26449
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this article is to assess the feasibility of using single-channel electroencephalography (EEG) measurement for detecting delirium in intubated Intensive care (ICU) patients and to assess the level of agreement between the EEG measurements, the CAM-ICU score and the clinical diagnosis of delirium. Materials and methods This study was an exploratory pilot between May 2021 and September 2021 including intubated patients in the ICU. For this study the Prolira (R) (Arnhem, The Netherlands) Deltascan single-channel EEG was used and compared with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)-ICU and the clinical diagnosis of delirium by ICU physicians. Results In total 23 patients were found eligible for this study, of which 20 were included in the final analysis. The patients mean age was 63.0 +/- 8.8 years, and the majority (thirteen) was male (65%). In total 17 of the 20 patients (85%) received the diagnosis delirium by the medical team. There were no statistically significant differences between the Deltascan and CAM-ICU measurements in diagnosing delirium per time point (p values respectively 0.21; 0.90; 0.34; 0.11; 0.056 and 0.091). AUCs for the agreement between the CAM-ICU and the Deltascan measurements were respectively: 0.676 +/- 0.205; 0.333 +/- 0.224; 0.402 +/- 0.146; 0.488 +/- 0.202; 0.06 +/- 0.077 and 0.06 +/- 0.109 (all p>0.05). AUCs for the level of agreement between the clinical diagnosis delirium and Deltascan were: 0.676 +/- 0.152; 0.686 +/- 0.146; 0.711 +/- 0.132; 0.688 +/- 0.136; 0.500 +/- 0.158 and 0.700 +/- 0.211 (all p>0.05). Conclusion In this exploratory study, we showed that there is no statistical agreement between CAM-ICU and Delta scan measurements. Secondly, there is a higher agreement, although not statistically significant between the clinical diagnoses of a delirium (by a clinician) with the Deltascan measurements. Despite this small study we think that the Deltascan can be of additional value in intubated ICU patients and therefore larger studies are needed to substantiate our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delirium in the intensive care unit: identifying difficulties in applying the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Fernanda Cecília Monroe dos Santos
    Adriana Sousa Rêgo
    Widlani Sousa Montenegro
    Sarah Tarcisia Rabelo Ferreira de Carvalho
    Rodrigo Costa Cutrim
    Abraão Albino Mendes Júnior
    Fábio Henrique Ferreira Pereira
    Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho
    Daniela Bassi-Dibai
    [J]. BMC Nursing, 21
  • [2] Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Klugkist, M.
    Sedemund-Adib, B.
    Schmidtke, C.
    Schmucker, P.
    Sievers, H. H.
    Hueppe, M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIST, 2008, 57 (05): : 464 - +
  • [3] Delirium in the intensive care unit: identifying difficulties in applying the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Monroe dos Santo, Fernanda Cecilia
    Rego, Adriana Sousa
    Montenegro, Widlani Sousa
    Ferreira de Carvalho, Sarah Tarcisia Rabelo
    Cutrim, Rodrigo Costa
    Mendes Junior, Abraao Albino
    Ferreira Pereira, Fabio Henrique
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    Bassi-Dibai, Daniela
    [J]. BMC NURSING, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [4] Are intensive care nurses really superior to the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in detecting delirium?
    Spronk, Peter E.
    Riekerk-Grul, Bea
    Hofhuis, Jose G. M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2012, 14 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [5] Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings
    Miranda, Fabian
    Gonzalez, Francisco
    Plana, Maria Nieves
    Zamora, Javier
    Quinn, Terry J.
    Seron, Pamela
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):
  • [6] Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients - Validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)
    Ely, EW
    Inouye, SK
    Bernard, GR
    Gordon, S
    Francis, J
    May, L
    Truman, B
    Speroff, T
    Gautam, S
    Margolin, R
    Hart, RP
    Dittus, R
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (21): : 2703 - 2710
  • [7] Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Ely, EW
    Margolin, R
    Francis, J
    May, L
    Truman, B
    Dittus, R
    Speroff, T
    Gautam, S
    Bernard, GR
    Inouye, SK
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) : 1370 - 1379
  • [8] Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Mitasova, Adela
    Kostalova, Milena
    Bednarik, Josef
    Michalcakova, Radka
    Kasparek, Tomas
    Balabanova, Petra
    Dusek, Ladislav
    Vohanka, Stanislav
    Ely, E. Wesley
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (02) : 484 - 490
  • [9] CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (CAM-ICU) VERSUS CODING DATA FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF DELIRIUM
    Lovell, Tania
    Mackay, Josephine
    Kruger, Peter
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 33 : S33 - S33
  • [10] Validation of the Dutch version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM-ICU) for delirium screening in the Intensive Care Unit
    Vreeswijk, R.
    Toornvliet, A.
    Honing, M. L. H.
    Bakker, K.
    de Man, T.
    Daas, G.
    Spronk, P. E.
    de Jonghe, J. F. M.
    Kalisvaart, K. J.
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (02): : 73 - 78