Assessment of conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors for drag reduction of the DrivAer model

被引:5
|
作者
Nabutola, Kaloki L. [1 ]
Boetcher, Sandra K. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Embry Riddle Aeronaut Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 USA
关键词
Vehicle aerodynamics; Wheel and wheelhouse aerodynamics; Automotive; Active flow control; Passive flow control; DrivAer; DEVICES; FLOW;
D O I
10.1186/s42774-021-00086-7
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Aerodynamic drag is a large resistance force to vehicle motion, particularly at highway speeds. Conventional wheel deflectors were designed to reduce the wheel drag and, consequently, the overall vehicle drag; however, they may actually be detrimental to vehicle aerodynamics in modern designs. In the present study, computational fluid dynamics simulations were conducted on the notchback DrivAer model-a simplified, yet realistic, open-source vehicle model that incorporates features of a modern passenger vehicle. Conventional and air-jet wheel deflectors upstream of the front wheels were introduced to assess the effect of underbody-flow deflection on the vehicle drag. Conventional wheel-deflector designs with varying heights were observed and compared to 45(circle) and 90(circle) air-jet wheel deflectors. The conventional wheel deflectors reduced wheel drag but resulted in an overall drag increase of up to 10%. For the cases studied, the 90(circle) air jet did not reduce the overall drag compared to the baseline case; the 45(circle) air jet presented drag benefits of up to 1.5% at 35 m/s and above. Compared to conventional wheel deflectors, air-jet wheel deflectors have the potential to reduce vehicle drag to a greater extent and present the benefit of being turned off at lower speeds when flow deflection is undesirable, thus improving efficiency and reducing emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Experimental study of frictional drag reduction on a hull model by air-bubbling
    Ravina, E.
    Guidomei, S.
    [J]. PROGRESS IN MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING, 2018, : 207 - 212
  • [32] Optimization of unsteady jet control flow method for aerodynamic drag reduction of heavy truck model
    Phan, Thanh-Long
    Nguyen, Tien Thua
    Nguyen, Thi Huyen Trang
    [J]. RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 22
  • [33] Drag and heat flux reduction performance of supersonic vehicle with combination model of aerospike/aerodisk and double jet
    Xu Y.
    Chen X.
    [J]. Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39 (05):
  • [34] Experimental Study of Air Layer Drag Reduction with Bottom Cavity for A Bulk Carrier Ship Model
    Hao Wu
    Yong-peng Ou
    [J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2019, 33 : 554 - 562
  • [35] Assessment of Drag Reduction Devices Mounted on a Simplified Tractor-Trailer Truck Model
    Charles, Terrance
    Yang, Zhiyin
    Lu, Yiling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2021, 7 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [36] Experimental Study of Air Layer Drag Reduction with Bottom Cavity for A Bulk Carrier Ship Model
    WU Hao
    OU Yong-peng
    [J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2019, 33 (05) : 554 - 562
  • [37] Experimental Study of Air Layer Drag Reduction with Bottom Cavity for A Bulk Carrier Ship Model
    Wu Hao
    Ou Yong-peng
    [J]. CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 33 (05) : 554 - 562
  • [38] Experimental assessment of spanwise-oscillating dielectric electroactive surfaces for turbulent drag reduction in an air channel flow
    Davide Gatti
    Andreas Güttler
    Bettina Frohnapfel
    Cameron Tropea
    [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2015, 56
  • [39] Experimental assessment of spanwise-oscillating dielectric electroactive surfaces for turbulent drag reduction in an air channel flow
    Gatti, Davide
    Guettler, Andreas
    Frohnapfel, Bettina
    Tropea, Cameron
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2015, 56 (05)
  • [40] The Effect of Orifice Diameter Variations of Conical Cavity Synthetic Jet Actuator on the Drag Reduction of the Reversed Ahmed Body Model
    Harinaldi
    Trisno, Ramon
    Kertanegara, Bisma
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING (ICIDE 2017), 2017, : 16 - 20