Factors affecting participation in mammography screening

被引:0
|
作者
McNoe, B [1 ]
Richardson, AK [1 ]
Elwood, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] DUNEDIN SCH MED,DEPT PREVENT & SOCIAL MED,HUGH ADAM CANC EPIDEMIOL UNIT,DUNEDIN,NEW ZEALAND
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims. To assess factors influencing attendance or nonattendance at the first round of a population based mammography screening programme, in New Zealand. Method Representative samples of women who responded to an invitation to attend screening, and women who did not respond, were interviewed by telephone, by an interviewer independent of the screening programme. The response rates in those identified were 98% for attenders and 86% for nonattenders, giving final samples of 191 and 174 respectively. However, more nonattenders could not be contacted or had no known phone number. Results. Reasons given for attendance were primarily the need for reassurance, to detect breast cancer early, and the fact that the programme was free, a pilot programme, or recommended by their family doctor. Seventeen percent of attenders had been influenced by positive reports from other women. Of the nonattenders; 7% were ineligible for mammography, 20% did not attend because of practical difficulties and convenience, and 20% expressed concern or fear of the procedure or were influenced by negative reports from other women. Attenders and nonattenders did not differ in regard to age, education, income, socioeconomic status, degree of worry when the invitation was received, or physical distance from their home to the screening centre, although nonattenders estimated the travel would take considerably longer than did attenders. Ninety percent of attenders intend to come to the second round of screening. Forty three percent-of nonattenders intend to participate at future rounds of screening, this figure being 80% in those who did not attend because of logistic or convenience reasons, and 27% for those who did not attend because of fear or negative reports. Conclusions. The main reasons given for nonattendance are approximately equally divided between practical difficulty, and negative attitude towards the process. Most of those who did not attend for reasons of convenience intend to participate at future rounds, so that overall almost half of nonattenders intend to participate at future rounds. Therefore we recommend that invitations for future screening rounds should be sent to women who do not participate in the first round of population based screening.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:359 / 361
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychological factors affecting participation in cervical screening for young women: a qualitative study
    Okoeki, Mabel O.
    Steven, Alison
    Geddes, Lesley
    LANCET, 2016, 388 : 82 - 82
  • [22] Psychological, Socio-economical and Health Related Factors that Influence Participation in Mammography Screening in Greece
    Kaltsa, A.
    Cox, K.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (03) : 317 - 318
  • [23] Lifestyle and occupational factors associated with participation in breast mammography screening among Western Australian women
    Carey, Renee N.
    El-Zaemey, Sonia
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2020, 27 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [24] Comparison of Factors Affecting Repeat Mammography Screening of Low-Income Mexican American Women
    Lopez-McKee, Gloria
    McNeill, Jeanette A.
    Bader, Julia
    Morales, Pat
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2008, 35 (06) : 941 - 947
  • [25] Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer
    Kriege, Mieke
    Brekelmans, Cecile T. M.
    Obdeijn, Inge Marie
    Boetes, Carla
    Zonderland, Harmine M.
    Muller, Sara H.
    Kok, Theo
    Manoliu, Radu A.
    Besnard, A. Peter E.
    Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M. A.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Bartels, Carina C. M.
    Kaas, Reini
    Meijer, Siebren
    Oosterwijk, Jan C.
    Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Klijn, Jan G. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [26] Factors Affecting Sensitivity and Specificity of Screening Mammography and MRI in Women with an Inherited Risk for Breast Cancer
    Mieke Kriege
    Cecile T. M. Brekelmans
    Inge Marie Obdeijn
    Carla Boetes
    Harmine M. Zonderland
    Sara H. Muller
    Theo Kok
    Radu A. Manoliu
    A. Peter E. Besnard
    Madeleine M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst
    Caroline Seynaeve
    Carina C. M. Bartels
    Reini Kaas
    Siebren Meijer
    Jan C. Oosterwijk
    Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
    Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar
    Emiel J. T. Rutgers
    Harry J. de Koning
    Jan G. M. Klijn
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006, 100 : 109 - 119
  • [27] Factors Affecting Mammography Screening Utilization among Educated Women in Al Beheira Governorate, Egypt
    Salama, Basem M. M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (04) : 522 - 525
  • [28] Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with a hereditary risk for breast cancer
    不详
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 4 (02): : 59 - 59
  • [29] Health beliefs associated with participation in a mammography screening program
    Garrido, MJG
    Ferrandis, ED
    Vaillo, YA
    Hernández, JT
    BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOLOGY-PSICOLOGIA CONDUCTUAL, 2000, 8 (02): : 357 - 373
  • [30] EXPLORING ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION IN MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING IN AN HMO
    MCBRIDE, CM
    CURRY, SJ
    TAPLIN, S
    ANDERMAN, C
    GROTHAUS, L
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 1993, 2 (06) : 599 - 605