Social and territorial inequalities in breast and cervical cancers screening uptake: a cross-sectional study in France

被引:7
|
作者
Ouanhnon, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Rouge Bugat, Marie-Eve [1 ,2 ]
Lamy, Sebastien [2 ,3 ]
Druel, Vladimir [1 ,2 ]
Delpierre, Cyrille [2 ,4 ]
Grosclaude, Pascale [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, DUMG Dept Univ Med Gen, Toulouse, France
[2] CERPOP, INSERM UMR S 1027, Toulouse, France
[3] Inst Claudius Regaud, Registre Canc Tarn, Toulouse, France
[4] Univ Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, LEASP, Toulouse, France
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
gynaecological oncology; general medicine (see internal medicine); health policy; organisation of health services; social medicine; preventive medicine; ECOLOGICAL DEPRIVATION INDEX; HEALTH; WOMEN; LEVEL; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055363
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the impact of socio-territorial characteristics on mammography and pap smear uptake according to the place of residence in the recommended age groups, and second outside the recommended age groups. Setting and participants We used an existing dataset of 1 027 039 women which combines data from the Health Insurance information systems, with census data from Midi-Pyrenees, France. Primary and secondary outcome measures Our outcome was, for each woman, the uptake of the pap smear and the uptake of the mammography during the year. Results A social gradient of screening uptake was found in the recommended age groups. This gradient was stronger in large urban areas: (1) For mammography: decile 10 (the most deprived) vs 1 (the least deprived), adjusted OR 0.777, 95% CI (0.748 to 0.808) in large urban area; adjusted OR= 0.808 for decile 1 to 0.726 for decile 10 in other areas vs decile 1 in urban areas; (2) For pap smear: decile 10 vs 1 adjusted OR 0.66, 95%CI (0.642 to 0.679) in large urban areas; adjusted OR= 0.747 for decile 1 to 0.562 for decile 10 in other areas vs decile 1 in urban areas). Screening rates were globally higher in large urban areas. For mammography, the social and territorial disparities were higher outside the recommended age group. Conclusions Offering a universal approach to every woman, as it is often the case in nationally organised screening programmes, is likely to be insufficient to ensure real equity in access. Developing global dataset combining health data and diverse socioeconomic data, at individual and contextual levels, could enable a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in this social gradient, and therefore, the development of targeted territorial actions to improve equity of access to healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sociodemographic and gynaecological factors that influence uptake of cervical cancer screening. A cross-sectional study in Calabar, Nigeria
    Ago, Boniface U.
    Efiok, Efiok E.
    Abeng, Sunday E.
    AFRICAN HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 22 (04) : 96 - 103
  • [22] Uptake of cervical cancer screening among sex workers living with HIV in Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study
    Akolo, Maureen
    Gelmon, Lawrence
    Musembi, Horatius
    Mutwiri, Benard
    Kambo, Isabel
    Kimani, Joshua
    Akolo, Christopher
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2024, 11
  • [23] Socio-Territorial Inequities in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Programme-A Cross-Sectional Multilevel Study
    Rollet, Quentin
    Guillaume, Elodie
    Launay, Ludivine
    Launoy, Guy
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [24] Which determinants should be considered to reduce social inequalities in paediatric dental care access? A cross-sectional study in France
    Marquillier, Thomas
    Trentesaux, Thomas
    Pierache, Adeline
    Delfosse, Caroline
    Lombrail, Pierre
    Azogui-Levy, Sylvie
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [25] Screening and infectious diseases of new migrants in France: A retrospective cross-sectional study
    Douillet, Delphine
    El Mahieu, Rafael
    Delori, Maud
    Baudry, Emmanuel
    Griffiths, Karolina
    Roy, Pierre-Marie
    Vandamme, Yves-Marie
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2017, 17 : 64 - 65
  • [26] Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data
    Moser, Kath
    Patnick, Julietta
    Beral, Valerie
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1480 - 1484
  • [27] Inequalities in reported use of cervical screening in Estonia: results from cross-sectional studies in 2004–2020
    Maria Suurna
    Madleen Orumaa
    Inge Ringmets
    Kersti Pärna
    BMC Women's Health, 22
  • [28] Evaluation of a combined screening programme for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers in France
    de Villemeur, Agathe Billette
    Exbrayat, Catherine
    Garnier, Anne
    Ancelle-Park, Rosemary
    Feley, Jean-Pierre
    Jestin, Christine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (01) : 26 - 35
  • [29] Predictors of uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Urban Tanzania: community-based cross-sectional study
    Mboineki, Joanes Faustine
    Wang, Panpan
    Dhakal, Kamala
    Getu, Mikiyas Amare
    Millanzi, Walter Cleophance
    Chen, Changying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 65 (09) : 1593 - 1602
  • [30] Barriers and facilitators in cervical cancer screening uptake in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire in 2018: a cross-sectional study
    Simon P. Boni
    Franck Gnahatin
    Jean-Claude Comoé
    Boris Tchounga
    Didier Ekouevi
    Apollinaire Horo
    Innocent Adoubi
    Antoine Jaquet
    BMC Cancer, 21