Ottawa panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for patient education programmes in the management of osteoarthritis

被引:8
|
作者
Brosseau, Lucie [1 ]
Egan, Mary [2 ]
Wells, George [3 ]
Tugwell, Peter [3 ,4 ]
Dubouloz, Claire-Jehanne [5 ]
Casimiro, Lnn [6 ]
King, Judy
Jelley, Wilma
Welch, Vivian A. [3 ,4 ]
Sredic, Danijel [7 ]
Trafford, Laura [7 ]
De Angelis, Gino [8 ]
McEwan, Jessica [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Sch Rehabil Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Rehabil Sci, Program Occupat Therapy, Fac Hlth Sci, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Global Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Rehabil, Program Occupat Therapy, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[6] Montfort Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Human Kinet, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Ottawa, Hlth Sci Lib, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
clinical practice guidelines; epidemiology; evidence-based practice; osteoarthritis; physical rehabilitation; rheumatology; ARTHRITIS SELF-MANAGEMENT; TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT; HEALTH-CARE SERVICES; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; OLDER-ADULTS; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; EXERCISE COMPONENT; PAIN; OUTCOMES; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0017896910394335
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop guidelines and recommendations on patient education programmes of any type, targeted specially to individuals with OA and which were designed to improve the clinical effectiveness of managing OA. Methods: The Ottawa Methods Group contacted specialized organizations that focus on management for individuals diagnosed with OA to nominate nine experienced clinicians specializing in various fields -rheumatology, physiatry, medicine, occupational therapy, physical therapy - and a patient with OA. The EBCPGs in this report were created based on the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. The Ottawa Panel graded the recommendations according to levels (I for randomized controlled trials [RCTs], II for non-randomized studies) and strength of evidence (A, B, C, C+, D, D+, or D-). Results: Using a systematic approach to our literature search, a total of over 1000 articles was found on the efficacy of patient education for OA, and 57 articles were recognized as potentially relevant. Based on the inclusion and exclusion selection criteria, 20 studies were ultimately included. Results from the Jadad scale illustrated that seven of the 20 studies included were considered of high methodological quality (>= 3). The remaining studies received low scores, therefore they were categorized as poor methodological quality trials. Conclusion: This review of the studies to date seems to indicate the potential of patient education for OA to positively affect pain, at least in the short-term, and exercise compliance in the longer term. While the programmes reviewed varied widely in the focus and approach of education, a number of promising 'effective ingredients' seem to be suggested by this review. The Ottawa Panel recommendations are in concordances with other clinical practice guidelines related to the efficacy of patient education for the management of OA, especially to improve pain, physical activity level, self-efficacy and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 358
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条