Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Hedjoudje, Abdellah [1 ,2 ]
Cheurfa, Cherifa [3 ]
Farha, Jad [2 ]
Jais, Benedicte [1 ]
Aubert, Alain [1 ]
Lorenzo, Diane [1 ]
Maire, Frederique [1 ]
Badurdeen, Dilhana [2 ]
Kumbhari, Vivek [2 ]
Prat, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Beaujon, AP HP, DMU Digest, Serv Endoscopie Digest, 100 Blvd Gen Leclerc, F-92110 Clichy, France
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Div Gastroenterol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cite Res Ctr, Cochrane France, INSERM,CRESS,UMR1153,Epidemiol & Stat, Paris, France
关键词
electrocautery; electrocoagulation; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; pancreatitis; ELECTROSURGICAL CURRENT; ENDOCUT MODE; PURE-CUT; BILIARY SPHINCTEROTOMY; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; COMPLICATIONS; PANCREATITIS; RISK; INCONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1177/26317745211062983
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography acute pancreatitis (PAP) and post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage are known adverse events of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Various electrosurgical currents can be used for endoscopic sphincterotomy. The extent to which this influences adverse events remains unclear. We assessed the comparative safety of different electrosurgical currents, through a Bayesian network meta-analysis of published studies merging direct and indirect comparison of trials. Methods: We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy. Results: Nine studies comparing four electrocautery modes (blended cut, pure cut, endocut, and pure cut followed by blended cut) with a combined enrollment of 1615 patients were included. The pooled results of the network meta-analysis did not show a significant difference in preventing post-sphincterotomy pancreatitis when comparing electrocautery modes. However, pure cut was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of bleeding compared with endocut [relative risk = 4.30; 95% confidence interval (1.53-12.87)]. On the other hand, the pooled results of the network meta-analysis showed no significant difference in prevention of bleeding when comparing blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus endocut, pure cut followed by blended cut versus blended cut, pure cut versus blended cut, and pure cut versus pure cut followed by blended cut. The results of rank probability found that endocut was most likely to be ranked the best. Conclusion: No electrocautery mode was superior to another with regard to preventing PAP. Endocut was superior with respect to preventing bleeding. Therefore, we suggest performing endoscopic sphincterotomy with endocut.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Yangyang
    Su, Peizhu
    Lin, Yinghao
    Lin, Siheng
    Xiao, Kun
    Chen, Pingyan
    An, Shengli
    Bai, Yang
    Zhi, Fachao
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 937 - 945
  • [2] Effects and Safety of Different Silver Preparation in Burns Treatment: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
    Kuerban, Dilixiati
    Maimaiti, Maisiwuti
    Chen, Zhao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS, 2023, 22 (02): : 298 - 306
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of different doses of baricitinib for rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Wang Haikun
    Wu Na
    Su Dan
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (38) : E30676
  • [4] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Xiao-Ming
    Hu, Bing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (48) : 9453 - 9460
  • [5] Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis:A meta-analysis
    Xiao-Ming Yang
    Bing Hu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (48) : 9453 - 9460
  • [6] The efficacy and safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jorge A. López-Cossio
    Enrique Murcio-Pérez
    Gustavo López Arce-Ángeles
    Omar D. Borjas-Almaguer
    Félix Ignacio Téllez-Ávila
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 9062 - 9069
  • [7] Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Endoscopic Treatments for Early Esophageal Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis
    Wenyu Hu
    Jia Yu
    Nan Yao
    Xiaotong Li
    Yixue Yang
    Ling Wang
    Mengzi Sun
    Yinpei Guo
    Han Wang
    Shoumeng Yan
    Bo Li
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022, 26 : 1097 - 1108
  • [8] The efficacy and safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lopez-Cossio, Jorge A.
    Murcio-Perez, Enrique
    Arce-Angeles, Gustavo Lopez
    Borjas-Almaguer, Omar D.
    Tellez-Avila, Felix Ignacio
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (02): : 964 - 974
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Four Different Endoscopic Treatments for Early Esophageal Cancer: a Network Meta-analysis
    Hu, Wenyu
    Yu, Jia
    Yao, Nan
    Li, Xiaotong
    Yang, Yixue
    Wang, Ling
    Sun, Mengzi
    Guo, Yinpei
    Wang, Han
    Yan, Shoumeng
    Li, Bo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (05) : 1097 - 1108
  • [10] ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION VS ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY: AN UPDATE META-ANALYSIS
    Tringali, A.
    Baron, T. H.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2015, 47 : E98 - E98