A Scoping Review to Find Out Worldwide COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Its Underlying Determinants

被引:111
|
作者
Biswas, Md Rafiul [1 ]
Alzubaidi, Mahmood Saleh [1 ]
Shah, Uzair [1 ]
Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa A. [1 ]
Shah, Zubair [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Doha 34110, Qatar
关键词
PRISMA; scoping review; determinants; hesitancy; acceptance; vaccine efficacy; vaccine safety; coverage; SARS-COV2; COVID-19; INTENTION; ACCEPTABILITY; WILLINGNESS; CORONAVIRUS; ACCEPTANCE; BELIEFS; REFUSAL; WORKERS; RECEIVE; NURSES;
D O I
10.3390/vaccines9111243
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The current crisis created by the coronavirus pandemic is impacting all facets of life. Coronavirus vaccines have been developed to prevent coronavirus infection and fight the pandemic. Since vaccines might be the only way to prevent and stop the spread of coronavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO) has already approved several vaccines, and many countries have started vaccinating people. Misperceptions about vaccines persist despite the evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy. Objectives: To explore the scientific literature and find the determinants for worldwide COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy as reported in the literature. Methods: PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed to conduct a scoping review of literature on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and willingness to vaccinate. Several databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar) were searched to find relevant articles. Intervention- (i.e., COVID-19 vaccine) and outcome- (i.e., hesitancy) related terms were used to search in these databases. The search was conducted on 22 February 2021. Both forward and backward reference lists were checked to find further studies. Three reviewers worked independently to select articles and extract data from selected literature. Studies that used a quantitative survey to measure COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance were included in this review. The extracted data were synthesized following the narrative approach and results were represented graphically with appropriate figures and tables. Results: 82 studies were included in this scoping review of 882 identified from our search. Sometimes, several studies had been performed in the same country, and it was observed that vaccine hesitancy was high earlier and decreased over time with the hope of vaccine efficacy. People in different countries had varying percentages of vaccine uptake (28-86.1%), vaccine hesitancy (10-57.8%), vaccine refusal (0-24%). The most common determinants affecting vaccination intention include vaccine efficacy, vaccine side effects, mistrust in healthcare, religious beliefs, and trust in information sources. Additionally, vaccination intentions are influenced by demographic factors such as age, gender, education, and region. Conclusions: The underlying factors of vaccine hesitancy are complex and context-specific, varying across time and socio-demographic variables. Vaccine hesitancy can also be influenced by other factors such as health inequalities, socioeconomic disadvantages, systemic racism, and level of exposure to misinformation online, with some factors being more dominant in certain countries than others. Therefore, strategies tailored to cultures and socio-psychological factors need to be developed to reduce vaccine hesitancy and aid informed decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Africa: a scoping review
    Ackah, Betty B. B.
    Woo, Michael
    Stallwood, Lisa
    Fazal, Zahra A.
    Okpani, Arnold
    Ukah, Ugochinyere Vivian
    Adu, Prince A.
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [2] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Africa: a scoping review
    Betty B. B. Ackah
    Michael Woo
    Lisa Stallwood
    Zahra A. Fazal
    Arnold Okpani
    Ugochinyere Vivian Ukah
    Prince A. Adu
    [J]. Global Health Research and Policy, 7
  • [3] US Parental Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scoping Review
    Baker, Christina
    Cook, Paul F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL NURSING, 2024,
  • [4] Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review
    Deml, Michael J.
    Githaiga, Jennifer Nyawira
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [5] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants
    Pourrazavi, Sara
    Fathifar, Zahra
    Sharma, Manoj
    Allahverdipour, Hamid
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES, 2023, 13 (01): : 21 - 35
  • [6] COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Latin America and Africa: a scoping review
    Goncalves, Bruna Aparecida
    Matos, Camila Carvalho de Souza Amorim
    Ferreira, Jonathan Vicente dos Santos
    Itagyba, Renata Fortes
    Moco, Vinicius Rocha
    Couto, Marcia Thereza
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2023, 39 (08):
  • [7] Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Intention, and Hesitancy: A Scoping Review
    Joshi, Ashish
    Kaur, Mahima
    Kaur, Ritika
    Grover, Ashoo
    Nash, Denis
    El-Mohandes, Ayman
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
  • [8] Determinants of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy spectrum
    Piltch-Loeb, Rachael
    Silver, Diana R.
    Kim, Yeerae
    Norris, Hope
    McNeill, Elizabeth
    Abramson, David M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [10] Individual determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
    Gerretsen, Philip
    Kim, Julia
    Caravaggio, Fernando
    Quilty, Lena
    Sanches, Marcos
    Wells, Samantha
    Brown, Eric E.
    Agic, Branka
    Pollock, Bruce G.
    Graff-Guerrero, Ariel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):