Study of a large scale powdered activated carbon pilot: Removals of a wide range of emerging and priority micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents

被引:191
|
作者
Mailler, R. [1 ]
Gasperi, J. [1 ]
Coquet, Y. [2 ]
Deshayes, S. [1 ,3 ]
Zedek, S. [1 ]
Cren-Olive, C. [4 ]
Cartiser, N. [4 ]
Eudes, V. [3 ]
Bressy, A. [1 ]
Caupos, E. [1 ]
Moilleron, R. [1 ]
Chebbo, G. [5 ]
Rocher, V. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Est, AgroParisTech, LEESU, UMR MA 102, F-94010 Creteil, France
[2] SAUR, Direct Rech & Dev, F-78064 Guyancourt, France
[3] LCPP, F-75015 Paris, France
[4] CNRS, UMR 5280, ISA, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France
[5] Univ Paris Est, AgroParisTech, LEESU, UMR MA 102, F-77455 Champs Sur Marne 2, Marne La Vallee, France
[6] SIAAP, Direct Dev & Prospect, F-92700 Colombes, France
关键词
Pharmaceuticals; Emerging pollutants; Adsorption; Powdered activated carbon; Wastewater treatment; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS; PARIS CONURBATION FRANCE; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; ORGANIC MICROPOLLUTANTS; ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; SURFACE WATERS; EQUILIBRIUM ADSORPTION; AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The efficacy of a fluidized powdered activated carbon (PAC) pilot (CarboPlus (R)) was studied in both nominal (total nitrification + post denitrification) and degraded (partial nitrification + no denitrification) configuration of the Seine Centre WWTP (Colombes, France). In addition to conventional wastewater parameters 54 pharmaceuticals and hormones (PhPHs) and 59 other emerging pollutants were monitored in influents and effluents of the pilot. Thus, the impacts of the WWTP configuration, the process operation and the physico-chemical properties of the studied compounds were assessed in this article. Among the 26 PhPHs quantified in nominal WWTP configuration influents, 8 have high dissolved concentrations (>100 ng/L), 11 have an intermediary concentration (10-100 ng/L) and 7 are quantified below 10 nWL. Sulfamethoxazole is predominant (about 30% of the sum of the PhPHs). Overall, 6 PhPHs are poorly to moderately removed (<60%), such as ibuprofen, paracetamol or estrone, while 9 are very well removed (>80%), i.e. beta blockers, carbamazepine or trimethoprim, and 11 are well eliminated (60-80%), i.e. diclofenac, naproxen or sulfamethoxazole. In degraded WWTP configuration, higher levels of organic matter and higher concentrations of most pollutants are observed. Consequently, most PhPHs are substantially less removed in percentages but the removed flux is higher. Thus, the PAC dose required to achieve a given removal percentage is higher in degraded WWTP configuration. For the other micropollutants (34 quantified), artificial sweeteners and phthalates are found at particularly high concentrations in degraded WWTP configuration influents, up to mu g/L range. Only pesticides, bisphenol A and parabens are largely eliminated (50-95%), while perfluorinated acids, PAHs, triclosan and sweeteners are not or weakly removed (<50%). The remaining compounds exhibit a very variable fate from campaign to campaign. The fresh PAC dose was identified as the most influencing operation parameter and is strongly correlated to performances. Charge and hydrophobicity of compounds have been recognized as crucial for the micropollutant adsorption on PAC, as well as the molecular weight. Finally, a PAC dose of 10 mg/L allows an average removal of 72-80% of the sum of the PhPHs in nominal WWTP configuration. The comparaison of the results with those from the scarce other studies tends to indicate that an extrapolation of them to different PAC processes and to other WWTPs could be possible and relevant, taking into account the differences of water quality from WWTP to WWTP. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 330
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Removal of a wide range of emerging pollutants from wastewater treatment plant discharges by micro-grain activated carbon in fluidized bed as tertiary treatment at large pilot scale
    Mailler, R.
    Gasperi, J.
    Coquet, Y.
    Bulete, A.
    Vulliet, E.
    Deshayes, S.
    Zedek, S.
    Mirande-Bret, C.
    Eudes, V.
    Bressy, A.
    Caupos, E.
    Moilleron, R.
    Chebbo, G.
    Rocher, V.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 542 : 983 - 996
  • [2] Pharmaceutical adsorption from the primary and secondary effluents of a wastewater treatment plant by powdered activated carbon
    Hu, Jingyi
    Shang, Ran
    Frolova, Marta
    Heijman, Bas
    Rietveld, Luuk
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (45) : 21304 - 21313
  • [3] Removal of organic micropollutants from municipal wastewater by powdered activated carbon-activated sludge treatment
    Qian, J.
    Riede, P.
    Abbt-Braun, G.
    Parniske, J.
    Metzger, S.
    Morck, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 50
  • [4] Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent
    Bonvin, Florence
    Jost, Livia
    Randin, Lea
    Bonvin, Emmanuel
    Kohn, Tamar
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 90 : 90 - 99
  • [5] Removal of emerging micropollutants from wastewater by activated carbon adsorption: Experimental study of different activated carbons and factors influencing the adsorption of micropollutants in wastewater
    Mailler, R.
    Gasperi, J.
    Coquet, Y.
    Derome, C.
    Bulete, A.
    Vulliet, E.
    Bressy, A.
    Varrault, G.
    Chebbo, G.
    Rocher, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 4 (01): : 1102 - 1109
  • [6] Characteristic numbers of granular activated carbon for the elimination of micropollutants from effluents of municipal wastewater treatment plants
    Benstoem, F.
    Pinnekamp, J.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 76 (02) : 279 - 285
  • [7] Elimination of micropollutants and transformation products from a wastewater treatment plant effluent through pilot scale ozonation followed by various activated carbon and biological filters
    Knopp, Gregor
    Prasse, Carsten
    Ternes, Thomas A.
    Comel, Peter
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 100 : 580 - 592
  • [8] Pilot-scale removal of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater: Comparison of granular and powdered activated carbon treatment at three wastewater treatment plants
    Karelid, Victor
    Larsson, Gen
    Bjorlenius, Berndt
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 491 - 502
  • [9] Organic micropollutants in a large wastewater treatment plant: What are the benefits of an advanced treatment by activated carbon adsorption in comparison to conventional treatment?
    Guillossou, Ronan
    Le Roux, Julien
    Mailler, Romain
    Vulliet, Emmanuelle
    Morlay, Catherine
    Nauleau, Fabrice
    Gasperi, Johnny
    Rocher, Vincent
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 218 : 1050 - 1060
  • [10] Metaproteomics of activated sludge from a wastewater treatment plant - A pilot study
    Puettker, Sebastian
    Kohrs, Fabian
    Benndorf, Dirk
    Heyer, Robert
    Rapp, Erdmann
    Reichl, Udo
    [J]. PROTEOMICS, 2015, 15 (20) : 3596 - 3601