The use of levonorgestrel for emergency past coital contraception after rape, has raised strong and recurring discussions during 2004 and 2005 in Chile. The debate has been centered in its presumed post fertilization or anti implantation effect, that some consider an abortive action. There are no scientific evidences supporting this effect, with divergences about the ontological status of the embryo. Therefore, the use fo levonorgestrel implies bioethical decisions that, in a democratic and pluralistic society, should be solved considering individual and collective responsibilities, conditions of equity and the informed automony of the affected women. Their moral values and their capacity to assume the consequences of an assault on their dignity, honor and self-esteem, in addition to physical and mental injuries, should also be considered.
机构:
Dunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
Univ Otago, Med Sch, Otago Bioeth Ctr, Dunedin, New ZealandDunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
机构:
Dunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
Univ Otago, Med Sch, Otago Bioeth Ctr, Dunedin, New ZealandDunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
Gillett, Grant
Walker, Simon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Otago Bioeth Ctr, Bioeth, Dunedin, New ZealandDunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
机构:
Dunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
Univ Otago, Otago Bioeth Ctr, Med Sch, Dunedin, New ZealandDunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand
Gillett, Grant
Walket, Simon
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Otago Bioeth Ctr, Bioeth, Dunedin, New ZealandDunedin Publ Hosp, Med Eth, Dunedin, New Zealand