Lower limit of soil water availability

被引:87
|
作者
Savage, MJ
Ritchie, JT
Bland, WL
Dugas, WA
机构
[1] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV,DEPT CROP & SOIL SCI,E LANSING,MI 48824
[2] TEXAS AGR EXPTL STN,BLACKLAND RES CTR,MADISON,WI 53706
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040024x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Estimating the available soil water reservoir is needed for developing a strategy for optimum management of rainfed crops in marginal dry regions. Previous research on measurement of the lower limit water content of soil water availability (required for calculation of the total soil water reservoir) has shown unexplained discrepancies between field estimates of the water content at which plants are dead or dormant due to soil water deficit and laboratory estimates of the water content at a water potential of -1.5 kJ kg(-1). Whether such discrepancies are due to sample size, handling, or the choice of -1.5 kJ kg(-1) as the lower limit is not clear, This study was designed to determine what the limit is under controlled conditions, and to test the appropriateness of the -1.5 kJ kg(-1) value. We used in situ soil psychrometers to measure soil mater potential (psi) as water was withheld from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants in a rain-sheltered lysimeter monolith and from sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in glasshouse pots. The loner limit psi was -2.2 kJ kg(-1) in the lysimeter experiment and <-2.5 kJ kg(-1) in the glasshouse, With the lysimeter, the difference between the soil water content corresponding to -2.2 W and -1.5 W kg(-1) was <0.01 m(3) m(-3). Water potential at the greatest measurement depth (2.1 m) decreased rapidly from near 0 to -1.8 kJ kg(-1) over a period of 30 d, while root length density increased from nearly 0 to 2400 m m(-3). At an advanced stage of soil water deficit, there was limited upward movement of water from depths >2.1 m. No psi oscillations, corresponding to so-called hydraulic lift or nocturnal water transport between soil layers, were found at any depth in the lysimeter (0.5-2.1 m). Our results suggest that for Rater balance calculations requiring absolute accuracy for the water balance of the soil reservoir, the choice of the -1.5 kJ kg(-1) soil water potential is appropriate and corresponds closely to the held lower limit of soil water availability.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 651
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Polyethylene microplastic can adsorb phosphate but is unlikely to limit its availability in soil
    Khan, T. F.
    Hodson, M. E.
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [32] DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF SOIL-WATER AVAILABILITY TO PLANTS
    GARDNER, WR
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1965, 16 : 323 - +
  • [33] Nodulation alleviates the stress of lower water availability in Vachellia sieberiana
    Elizabeth M. Telford
    Nicola Stevens
    Guy F. Midgley
    Caroline E. R. Lehmann
    Plant Ecology, 2023, 224 : 387 - 402
  • [34] Nodulation alleviates the stress of lower water availability in Vachellia sieberiana
    Telford, Elizabeth M. M.
    Stevens, Nicola
    Midgley, Guy F. F.
    Lehmann, Caroline E. R.
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2023, 224 (04) : 387 - 402
  • [35] AVAILABILITY OF SOIL WATER TO PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AND METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS
    DENMEAD, OT
    SHAW, RH
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1962, 54 (05) : 385 - &
  • [37] LOWER LIMIT OF AVAILABLE WATER FOR 3 PLANT-SPECIES GROWN ON A MEDIUM-TEXTURED SOIL IN SOUTHWESTERN SASKATCHEWAN
    CUTFORTH, HW
    JEFFERSON, PG
    CAMPBELL, CA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1991, 71 (02) : 247 - 252
  • [38] Soil water availability and water absorption by maize in sodic soils with high water table
    Garello, Federico J.
    Ploschuk, Edmundo L.
    Melani, Esteban M.
    Taboada, Miguel A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 295
  • [39] A wax seal method for determining the lower limit of available soil moisture
    Briggs, LJ
    Shantz, HL
    BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1911, 51 : 0210 - 0219
  • [40] Effects of nutrition and soil water availability on water use in a Norway spruce stand
    Phillips, N
    Bergh, J
    Oren, R
    Linder, S
    TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (12-13) : 851 - 860