Decoding Collective Action Dilemmas in Historical Precincts of Delhi

被引:1
|
作者
Chauhan, Ekta [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Fac Econ Law & Soc, D-03046 Cottbus, Germany
关键词
IAD-NAAS framework; collective action dilemmas; heritage commons; New Delhi; participatory governance; ACTION SITUATIONS; HERITAGE; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.3390/su141811741
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a growing understanding that cultural heritage needs to be understood as a "common good", pivotal to the sustainable development of communities. Cultural goods create multiple value streams for stakeholder groups whose interests and objectives often collide, leading to governance failures. The management of cultural goods can be seen as a collective action problem arising from the interaction of numerous actors. In the first part, the article highlights the importance of analyzing cultural heritage sites and areas as common goods. Within this context, I highlight why collaborative processes of decision-making and planning are crucial for the sustainable conservation of heritage resources and tourism management. In the second section, the paper applies the Institutional Analysis and Development-Network of Adjacent Action Situations (IAD-NAAS) framework to explore collective action dilemmas at Nizamuddin Basti in New Delhi. Application of the framework allows one to explore interrelated governance dilemmas by understanding stakeholder dynamics within governance action situations with interdependent outcomes. The paper concludes with a suggestive framework for a cultural collaborative process keeping the cultural identity of residents as the focal point. While the IAD-NAAS framework is useful in diagnosing the contending interests and their consequences, the IAD framework could also be considered a starting point to define a framework for a collaborative process.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trust, social dilemmas and collective memories
    Rothstein, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 2000, 12 (04) : 477 - 501
  • [32] COLLECTIVE ACTION AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ON DIGITAL NETWORKS. HISTORICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS
    Sadaba, Igor
    [J]. ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 2012, 188 (756) : 781 - 794
  • [33] Collective action dilemmas of sustainable natural resource management: A case study on land marketization in rural China
    Zhou, Lin
    Zhou, Yinuo
    de Vries, Walter Timo
    Liu, Zhihang
    Sun, Hanyue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 439
  • [34] COLLECTIVE LITIGATION AS COLLECTIVE ACTION
    YEAZELL, SC
    [J]. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 1989, (01): : 43 - 68
  • [35] Collective Strength, Collective Action
    Manning, Mary Lou
    Harris, Anthony D.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (01): : 1 - 1
  • [36] Collective Collection, Collective Action
    Kieft, Robert H.
    Payne, Lizanne
    [J]. COLLECTION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 37 (3-4) : 137 - 152
  • [37] Who will attack the competitors? How political parties resolve strategic and collective action dilemmas in negative campaigning
    Dolezal, Martin
    Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz
    Mueller, Wolfgang C.
    [J]. PARTY POLITICS, 2017, 23 (06) : 666 - 679
  • [38] Collective strength, collective action
    Manning, Mary Lou
    Harris, Anthony D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (01) : 2 - 2
  • [39] From market failures to collective action dilemmas: Reframing environmental governance challenges in Latin America and beyond
    Muradian, Roldan
    Camilo Cardenas, Juan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 120 : 358 - 365
  • [40] Collective Action
    Phillips, C
    [J]. ART IN AMERICA, 1997, 85 (11): : 125 - 125