The behavioural best-worst method

被引：17

作者：

Kheybari, Siamak ^{[1
]}

Ishizaka, Alessio ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg IfM, Ctr Int Mfg, Dept Engn,Sch Technol, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England

[2] NEOMA Business Sch, 1 Rue Marechal Juin BP 215, F-76130 Mont St Aignan, France

来源：

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 2022年 / 209卷

关键词：

Best -worst method; Decision-maker?s behaviour; Multiple -criteria decision -making;

D O I：

10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118265

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

The best-worst method is a recent and promising highly-developed multi-criteria decision-making technique. However, the algorithm proposes a range of possible weights. To help decision-makers, we incorporate three different types of behaviour (i.e. balanced, risk-taking, and risk-averse) to select the best point for each weight. To this end, we develop three mathematical algorithms modelling the different behaviours. An example is presented to illustrate the behaviour of each algorithm. The different behaviours may lead to different results.

引用

页数：4

共 50 条

[21] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
Hollis, Geoff
Westbury, Chris
[J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (01) : 115 - 133
[22] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method Based on the Fuzzy Interval Scale
Goldani, Nastaran
Kazemi, Mostafa
[J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 59 - 73
[23] Testing the stability of utility parameters in repeated best, repeated best-worst and one-off best-worst studies
Giergiczny, Marek
Dekker, Thijs
Hess, Stephane
Chintakayala, Phani Kumar
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (04): : 457 - 476
[24] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
Geoff Hollis
Chris Westbury
[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2018, 50 : 115 - 133
[25] Group decision making in best-worst method when the best and worst are not unique: case study of scholar selection
Adali, Esra Aytac
Caglar, Atalay
[J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 29 (01): : 30 - 44
[26] Relations between best, worst, and best-worst choices for random utility models
de Palma, Andre
Kilani, Karim
Laffond, Gilbert
[J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 76 : 51 - 58
[27] Best-Worst Scaling with many items
Chrzan, Keith
Peitz, Megan
[J]. JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2019, 30 : 61 - 72
[28] A Numerical Comparison of the Sensitivity of the Geometric Mean Method, Eigenvalue Method, and Best-Worst Method
Mazurek, Jiri
Perzina, Radomir
Ramik, Jaroslav
Bartl, David
[J]. MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (05) : 1 - 13
[29] Is the best-worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study
Mazurek, Jiri
Perzina, Radomir
Strzalka, Dominik
Kowal, Bartosz
Kuras, Pawel
Puhrova, Barbora Petru
Rajs, Robert
[J]. 4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (03): : 387 - 409
[30] A Novel Extension of Best-Worst Method With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Reference Comparisons
Wan, Shuping
Dong, Jiuying
[J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 30 (06) : 1698 - 1711

← 1 2 3 4 5 →