Feature dissimilarities in the processing of German relative clauses in aphasia

被引:12
|
作者
Adelt, Anne [1 ]
Stadie, Nicole [1 ]
Lassotta, Romy [1 ]
Adani, Flavia [1 ]
Burchert, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Linguist, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Aphasia; Relative clauses; Relativized Minimality; Sentence processing; Morpho-syntactic features; Eye tracking; SUBJECT-OBJECT AMBIGUITIES; SENTENCE COMPREHENSION; AGRAMMATIC COMPREHENSION; CHILDRENS COMPREHENSION; AUDITORY COMPREHENSION; WH-QUESTIONS; DEFICITS; ACQUISITION; MINIMALITY; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.01.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The cross-linguistic finding of greater demands in processing object relatives as compared to subject relatives in individuals with aphasia and non-brain-damaged speakers has been explained within the Relativized Minimality approach. Based on this account, the asymmetry is attributed to an element intervening between the moved element and its extraction site in object relatives, but not in subject relatives. Moreover, it has been proposed that processing of object relatives is facilitated if the intervening and the moved elements differ in their internal feature structure. The present study investigates these predictions in German-speaking individuals with aphasia and a group of control participants by combining the visual world eye-tracking methodology with an auditory referent identification task. Our results provide support for the Relativized Minimality approach. Particularly, the degree of featural distinctness was shown to modulate the occurrence of the effects in aphasia. We claim that, due to reduced processing capacities, individuals with aphasia need a higher degree of featural dissimilarity to distinguish the moved from the intervening element in object relatives to overcome their syntactic deficit. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 37
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Processing relative clauses by Hungarian typically developing children
    Bence Kas
    Agnes Lukacs
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2012, 27 (04): : 500 - 538
  • [32] The Processing Foundation of Head-Final Relative Clauses
    Lin, Chien-Jer Charles
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS, 2008, 9 (04) : 813 - 837
  • [33] Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses
    Staub, Adrian
    [J]. COGNITION, 2010, 116 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [34] Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush
    Mak, WM
    Vonk, W
    Schriefers, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 54 (04) : 466 - 490
  • [35] Syntactic and pragmatic constraints on processing relative clauses.
    Ingram, J
    Chenery, H
    Cardell, E
    Hinchliffe, F
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 53 (03) : 181 - 181
  • [36] Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing
    He, Wenguang
    Xu, Na
    Ji, Runqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2017, 46 (05) : 1067 - 1086
  • [37] Bilingual children's online processing of relative clauses
    Katsika, Kalliopi
    Lialiou, Maria
    Allen, Shanley E. M.
    [J]. LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2024, 14 (04) : 446 - 475
  • [38] Genesis of generalizing relative clauses in Old High German
    Harm, V
    [J]. INDOGERMANISCHE FORSCHUNGEN, 2001, 106 : 241 - 261
  • [39] Time-Driven Effects on Processing Relative Clauses
    Andrea Schremm
    Merle Horne
    Mikael Roll
    [J]. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2016, 45 : 1033 - 1044
  • [40] The locus of processing for object relative clauses and the impact of methodology
    Hatfield, Hunter
    Artos, Tonic
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 31 (02) : 190 - 195