Input-to-State Stability of Periodic Orbits of Systems With Impulse Effects via Poincar Analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Veer, Sushant [1 ]
Rakesh [2 ]
Poulakakis, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Mech Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Math Sci, Newark, DE 19716 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Orbits; Limit-cycles; Legged locomotion; Asymptotic stability; Robustness; Stability analysis; Input-to-state stability (ISS); limit cycles; Poincare map; robustness; systems with impulse effects (SIEs); HYBRID ZERO DYNAMICS; STABILIZATION; CONTROLLERS;
D O I
10.1109/TAC.2019.2909684
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the relation between robustness of periodic orbits exhibited by systems with impulse effects and robustness of their corresponding Poincar maps. In particular, we prove that input-to-state stability (ISS) of a periodic orbit under external excitation in both continuous and discrete time is equivalent to ISS of the corresponding zero-input fixed point of the associated forced Poincar map. This result extends the classical Poincar analysis for asymptotic stability of periodic solutions to establish orbital ISS of such solutions under external excitation. In our proof, we define the forced Poincar map, and use it to construct ISS estimates for the periodic orbit in terms of ISS estimates of this map under mild assumptions on the input signals. As a consequence of the availability of these estimates, the equivalence between exponential stability (ES) of the fixed point of the zero-input (unforced) Poincar map and the ES of the corresponding orbit is recovered. The results can be applied naturally to study the robustness of periodic orbits of continuous-time systems as well. Although our motivation for extending classical Poincar analysis to address ISS stems from the need to design robust controllers for limit-cycle walking and running robots, the results are applicable to a much broader class of systems that exhibit periodic solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:4583 / 4598
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Input-to-state stability of Lur'e systems
    Sarkans, E.
    Logemann, H.
    MATHEMATICS OF CONTROL SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS, 2015, 27 (04) : 439 - 465
  • [32] Input-to-state stability and boundedness in Lurie systems
    Arcak, M
    Teel, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 : 62 - 67
  • [33] ROBUST INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY FOR HYBRID SYSTEMS
    Cai, Chaohong
    Teel, Andrew R.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 51 (02) : 1651 - 1678
  • [34] Input-to-state stability of networked control systems
    Nesic, D
    Teel, AR
    AUTOMATICA, 2004, 40 (12) : 2121 - 2128
  • [35] Input-to-state stability of switched nonlinear systems
    Wei Feng
    JiFeng Zhang
    Science in China Series F: Information Sciences, 2008, 51
  • [36] Exponential Stability and Input-to-State Stability of Polynomial Systems via an Observer with Sporadic Measurements
    Cai, Xu
    Lou, Xuyang
    Sid, Mohanmed Amine
    CIRCUITS SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2025,
  • [37] Results on input-to-state stability for hybrid systems
    Cai, Chaohong
    Teel, Andrew R.
    2005 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control & European Control Conference, Vols 1-8, 2005, : 5403 - 5408
  • [38] On input-to-state stability of impulsive stochastic systems
    Yao, Fengqi
    Qiu, Li
    Shen, Hao
    JOURNAL OF THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE-ENGINEERING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014, 351 (09): : 4636 - 4651
  • [39] Input-to-state stability of Lur’e systems
    E. Sarkans
    H. Logemann
    Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 2015, 27 : 439 - 465
  • [40] INPUT-TO-STATE STABILITY OF NONLINEAR IMPULSIVE SYSTEMS
    Dashkovskiy, Sergey
    Mironchenko, Andrii
    SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2013, 51 (03) : 1962 - 1987