Munich policy on end-of-life decisions

被引:0
|
作者
Winkler, Eva C. [2 ]
Borasio, Gian Domenico [3 ]
Jacobs, Peter [4 ]
Weber, Juergen [4 ]
Jox, Ralf J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Eth Geschichte & Theorie Med, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, NCT, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Lausanne, Lehrstuhl Palliativmed CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Klinikum Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
关键词
Shifting treatment goals; Advance directive; End-of-life decisions; Policy; Surrogate decision making; HEALTH-CARE ORGANIZATIONS; 6 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; ETHICS; PRINCIPLES; GUIDELINES; HOSPITALS; PHYSICIAN; GERMANY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00481-011-0150-z
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Definition of the problem Half of all deaths in Europe are nowadays preceded by decisions about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment. In clinical practice this is often recognized as an ethical challenge, but there are also legal uncertainties and organizational questions among clinicians. Here we present a hospital policy on end-of-life decision making which has the aims of reducing legal uncertainty, sensitizing hospital staff for the ethical dimension of end-of-life decisions, and fostering ethically justified decisions. From an organizational ethics perspective, the policy should provoke reflection and opinion formation on an ethically relevant topic, contribute to quality management in health care and, hence, improve patient satisfaction. Arguments The process of developing, updating, and implementing this hospital policy is presented. The core contents of the policy, illustrated by a decision-making algorithm, including the current state of law, central concepts, and criteria of end-of-life decision making, are also summarized. Finally, the process and content of the policy are scrutinized with regard to the following quality criteria of organizational ethics: deliberative process, transparency, representative composition of the issuing committee, implementation, and evaluation. Conclusion Health care institutions interested in adopting this policy are advised to discuss it in an authorized committee and tailor it to their own specific needs. This may be supported by a prior needs assessment. The committee should represent all those who will be working with the policy later.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 234
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Medical end-of-life decisions and legislation
    Nespolon, HM
    Kuhse, H
    Clark, M
    Woollard, KV
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1997, 167 (05) : 282 - 283
  • [32] The Law and Bioethics of End-of-Life Decisions
    Nafziger, James A. R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 2022, 70 (SUPP 1): : i394 - i416
  • [33] Gender influences end-of-life decisions
    ME Lissauer
    L Smitz-Naranjo
    SB Johnson
    [J]. Critical Care, 15 (Suppl 1):
  • [34] Medical end-of-life decisions in Norway
    Laake, JH
    Stubhaug, A
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2003, 57 (03) : 311 - 312
  • [35] End-of-life decisions, nurses, and the law
    Hewitt, Jayne
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2022, 35 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [36] THE ROLE OF CHAPLAINS IN END-OF-LIFE DECISIONS
    HOLST, LE
    [J]. HOSPITALS & HEALTH NETWORKS, 1994, 68 (10): : 9 - 9
  • [37] End-of-Life Care Decisions Reply
    Lissauer, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 214 (05) : 873 - 873
  • [38] Medical end-of-life decisions and legislation
    Syme, RRA
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 168 (09) : 468 - 469
  • [39] Communication challenges in end-of-life decisions
    Christoph, Becker
    Katharina, Beck
    Alessia, Vincent
    Sabina, Hunziker
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2020, 150 : w20351
  • [40] Ethics of Resuscitation and End-of-Life Decisions
    Bossaert, L. L.
    Perkins, G. D.
    Askitopoulou, H.
    Raffay, V. I.
    Greif, R.
    Haywood, K. L.
    Mentzelopoulos, S. D.
    Nolan, J. P.
    Van de Voorde, P.
    Xanthos, T. T.
    [J]. NOTFALL & RETTUNGSMEDIZIN, 2015, 18 (08): : 1035 - 1047