Stirring the construction project management with co-creation and continuous improvement

被引:5
|
作者
Savolainen, Jussi [1 ]
Kahkonen, Kalle [1 ]
Niemi, Olli [1 ]
Poutanen, Jenni [1 ]
Varis, Elisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, FI-33720 Tampere, Finland
关键词
Co-creation; construction management; continuous improvement; customer relations management; quality management;
D O I
10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00151-3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Gathering information that is capable to explain customers' needs is usually seen as a quite straightforward part of the traditional construction process: a customer should be able to tell all relevant needs in the first stage so that a building could be designed and built according to the gained information. But the process is lacking of service abilities if a customer wants to modify the given information due to a change in circumstances, albeit such a change is easily caused due turbulent economic situations and long spans in real-estate development projects. Hence the customer perspective regarding the construction management (CM) process should be accommodated better. In this paper, the case studies of the four premises improvement projects are reported upon, where the CM process was altered to include and apply the concepts of continuous improvement and co-creation. The process documentation covered the impacts of the case project on the usability of the premises, the indoor climate conditions (carbon dioxide and temperature) metering, the time lapse cameras and the on-line user feedback system. The documentation consists of the minutes of the meetings, the financial reporting and the time tables. Both the processes and the results of the projects are analysed. Based on the key findings, some suggestions are put forth upon how to improve the CM process to better serve customer interests and quality improvement in the future. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B. V.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Strategic management as an enabler of co-creation in public services
    Ongaro, Edoardo
    Sancino, Alessandro
    Pluchinotta, Irene
    Williams, Hannah
    Kitchener, Martin
    Ferlie, Ewan
    [J]. POLICY AND POLITICS, 2021, 49 (02): : 287 - 304
  • [32] The Co-creation Canvas
    Garmann-Johnsen, Niels F.
    Olsen, Dag H.
    Eikebrokk, Tom R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES 2020 (CENTERIS/PROJMAN/HCIST 2020), 2021, 181 : 189 - 197
  • [33] The meanings of co-creation
    Ind, Nicholas
    Coates, Nick
    [J]. EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 25 (01) : 86 - 95
  • [34] Ecosystems of Co-Creation
    Eckhardt, Jennifer
    Kaletka, Christoph
    Krueger, Daniel
    Maldonado-Mariscal, Karina
    Schulz, Ann Christin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY, 2021, 6
  • [35] CO-CREATION IN ORGANISATIONS
    Cheriet, Nabil
    Ahnyne, Redouane
    Saad, Ghizlane
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND GLOBALIZATION STUDIES (MIRDEC), 2017, : 109 - 115
  • [36] Co-creation and Synchronization
    Maeda, Yusuke
    Suzuki, Taira
    Okabayashi, Haruo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 504 - 504
  • [37] Co-creation as choreography
    Haanpaa, Minni
    [J]. QUALITATIVE MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (05): : 614 - 624
  • [38] An ontology co-design method for the co-creation of a continuous care ontology
    Ongenae, Femke
    Duysburgh, Pieter
    Sulmon, Nicky
    Verstraete, Mathijs
    Bleumers, Lizzy
    De Zutter, Saar
    Verstichel, Stijn
    Ackaert, Ann
    Jacobs, An
    De Turck, Filip
    [J]. APPLIED ONTOLOGY, 2014, 9 (01) : 27 - 64
  • [39] CHAOS: A Co-Creation
    Waldron, Hannah
    Braund, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ILLUSTRATION, 2020, 7 (1-2) : 205 - 223
  • [40] Managing your co-creation mix: co-creation ventures in distinctive contexts
    Roser, Thorsten
    DeFillippi, Robert
    Samson, Alain
    [J]. EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 25 (01) : 20 - 41